Tweet
This thread is not about abortion people. That discussion has been had and belongs in the Intellectual forum.
-
[COLOR=#4b0082][B][SIZE=4][FONT=trebuchet ms]“If you think you can, or you can’t, you’re right.”
-Henry Ford[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR] -
You can't kill something that hasn't been born! That's like calling the girl that refused to have sex with me last night a murderer cause she denied our baby the right to life.Originally posted by Darorinag
Dan, just think of the fetus as being black or jew. Then you'll see my point.this post = teh win.Comment
-
You can kill anything that's alive. Just because it's sheltered in the womb doesn't mean it's not alive. So yes, you can kill something that hasn't been born, because the birth that we often talk about is not the measure of life or death.. real birth is CONCEPTION. The "birth" that we know of is only the coming out of the fetus from the womb.You can't kill something that hasn't been born!
Oh please. Let's quit telling others what they should and should not talk about in a thread. This thread is about whatever I interpret it to be related to. And the hypocrisy of supporting abortion and then saying "this is sick" (re: killing a newborn) is not unrelated.This thread is not about abortion people. That discussion has been had and belongs in the Intellectual forum.
Last edited by Darorinag; 07-25-2004, 05:03 PM.Comment
-
Sorry there cupcake ... birth = "The emergence and separation of offspring from the body of the mother". Therefore, "real birth" would be the "the real emergence and separation of offspring from the body of the mother". Flushing out the fetus before it's born is nothing more than popping a zit. It simply can't survive on it's own. Heck even a new born baby can't survive on it's own ... especially the ones that are stuffed in freezers.
So let's agree to disagree since this is one of those no it's this way no it's that way topics ... you don't abort any of your offspring (moot point in your case
) and in exchange, don't try to dictate what other people should do. 
Last edited by Sip; 07-25-2004, 05:16 PM.this post = teh win.Comment
-
That means it's alright to kill BOTH a fetus AND a newborn, right? Because they can't survive on their own.....Flushing out the fetus before it's born is nothing more than popping a zit. It simply can't survive on it's own. Heck even a new born baby can't survive on it's own ...
How does that prove that there is no life before birth? Are you saying the fetus is actually DEAD? If not, then wouldn't it mean that it's alive? And if yes, doesn't that mean that you can KILL it?birth = "The emergence and separation of offspring from the body of the mother".
Dictate? Who's dictating anyone? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy. Everyone is free to do what they want, but it doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. And don't even start with the relativist arguments...in exchange, don't try to dictate what other people should do.Comment
-
You go, boy!Originally posted by Darorinag
Yeah, that whole argument of weather destroying a fetus is murder or not, is silly (not just what you brought up, Sea, but in general). There are plenty of elderly people who do, or are shortly going to need assistance in living. Should people be allowed to kill their parents, too, since to some, they're going to be a "burden I don't want to deal with", and then use the premise that this isn't murder since they're lifeless because they can't survive on their own? "They're no different then a fetus, your honor. They're not alive since they aren't self reliant. Thus, they have no life protecting legal rights. They're just useless, lifeless, disposable fetus. BOOya! I rest my case, your honor".
fe·tus [ ftəss ] (plural fe·tus·es)
noun
unborn offspring: an unborn vertebrate at a stage when all the structural features of the adult are recognizable, especially an unborn human offspring after eight weeks of development
I'd say that's a bit more than a zit waiting for some Clearasil, wouldn't you.
The argument really doesn't revolve around the legitimacy of life of an unborn child. The real debate is:
Pro abortion - "I have the right to do whatever I want to the life form, because it's inside my body, and I have control over my body".
Anti abortion - "It may be in your body, but you don't have the right to do what you want to a life form other than yourself".
Anyway, guys. Siggie's right. We already had a long, drawn out thread about this, and this is just a scratch on the surface of what we got into on that thread. We're just going to wined up having a repeat thread (of something other than religion for once).Comment
-
At least she had the courtesy of keeping the evidence intact.Comment
-
Please don't make these little cheap shots. You're better than that.Originally posted by SeapahnComment
-
wowwww! this thread is still open!! and it's been over 2 pages
Comment
-
I was really surprised when I heard about that. If she went through the agonizing pain to bring her child into this world, why on Earth did she kill him? She could have put him up for adoption. I don't get it.
Actually, it's not over two pages and with that kind of post, I won't be surprised if it gets closed now. No offense.Originally posted by hyebruin wowwww! this thread is still open!! and it's been over 2 pages I see...Comment
Comment