Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Evolution and Religion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    It has been mentioned before. I have said it several times.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by loseyourname It has been mentioned before. I have said it several times.
      My bad.

      Comment


      • #23
        Little miss Flamer - you're a bio student, no? What do you think about all this?

        Comment


        • #24
          I think it's a headache, and you guys are proving this.

          And what the hell is up with the assumption that bio students are evolution fanatics?

          Comment


          • #25
            My only assumption is that bio students have a requisite amount of knowledge pertaining to the subject and might have something to contribute. You needn't be fanatical.

            Comment


            • #26
              I wasn't referring to you about the assumption part, but rather people I have come across in my daily life.

              As far as my input...I offered my take on this issue in my very first post in this thread, in the form of a question. I don't feel that babbling on about it is necessary.
              Last edited by sSsflamesSs; 01-17-2004, 06:19 PM.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by loseyourname Evolution has an evidential basis, and both Gould and Dawkins have shown it quite well. Your belief in God is based entirely on personal conviction, much like the belief of the young earthers. In addition, nothing about evolution rules out creation. I don't see your conflict.
                And Gould and Dawkins have been wrong as well.

                Basically, this is no different than personal conviction.

                "Evidential basis". I like how nice language is used to give it an aura of empiricism. The fact is, your assertion that one species leads to another is anything but on an evidential basis. It is assumed.
                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Science is an inductive process, pal. Hume pointed out several hundred years ago that we do not witness any connection that might be named either "cause" or "effect." This does not negate the strength of the inductive logic. One species disappears, and is replaced by another species that is very closely related anatomically with one small variation that made it better suited to survive at that time and in that environment. Tell me what you think happened.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by loseyourname Science is an inductive process, pal. Hume pointed out several hundred years ago that we do not witness any connection that might be named either "cause" or "effect." This does not negate the strength of the inductive logic. One species disappears, and is replaced by another species that is very closely related anatomically with one small variation that made it better suited to survive at that time and in that environment. Tell me what you think happened.
                    But where is the evidence to suggest that? Of course it's just stated. That's just it. You state it is a fact, that so and so happened. Well? What empirical suggests that species jump to another species? I only ask because I am naturally looking for evidence, much like your quest in evidence for God, or what have you. If I see that I cannot find evidence to support evolution, I will simply deny it as an explanation, nevermind its mathematical improbability. You can't argue against mathematics can you?
                    Achkerov kute.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      There is a mountain of evidence consisting mostly of experiments conducted with bacteria and by observations of galapagos finches. Small changes are observed - in the case of microorganisms, jumps to entirely new species have been observed.

                      You have yet to propose an alternative explanation as to why the fossil record shows closely related species following one another chronologically and geographically.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X