Virgin or Experienced?

[gevo]

(n.) A woman who has had no carnal knowledge of man; a maid.

So if you ever think a guy is very good-looking, you lose your virginity? Oh give me a break! In that case, disregarding the whole 'never had sex' bit, I guess I'm not a virgin.

uhumm.. i take it your trying to be cute and smart.. but anywho, ill answer regardless...
I figured it was obvious what it meant.. it does not infer to having knowledge merely by seeing a man, or a naked one for that matter.. Carnal knowledge implies that one has "indulged" him/herself in physical contact (fore-play) with the opposite sex, and in this case specifically the female.. not that it is not the same for the male, that would be a double standard/contradiction and very hypocritical... SO! mademousel CK, you can go ahead and watch porn and look at a man and you are still a virgin

[garegin]

uhumm.. i take it your trying to be cute and smart.. but anywho, ill answer regardless...
I figured it was obvious what it meant.. it does not infer to having knowledge merely by seeing a man, or a naked one for that matter.. Carnal knowledge implies that one has "indulged" him/herself in physical contact (fore-play) with the opposite sex, and in this case specifically the female.. not that it is not the same for the male, that would be a double standard/contradiction and very hypocritical... SO! mademousel CK, you can go ahead and watch porn and look at a man and you are still a virgin

so again, one doesnt have to have intercouse to lose his virginity?
if i correctly understood u, it could be fore-play or physical bodily contact.

[gevo]

so again, one doesnt have to have intercouse to lose his virginity?
if i correctly understood u, it could be fore-play or physical bodily contact.

YOUR A GENIOUS!!!!! and taking it up the buttocks does not make you daddy's litle virgin girl .. smile guys its a beautiful day!

[garegin]

i dont have to worry about my "virginal" status

[HyeJinx1984]

Would just like to add that if you want to look at it from a scientific or academic standpoint, sexologists (YES, that's a real thing...) actually never ever use the term Virgin BECAUSE of conversations like thsi where people scramble to make their own definitions. So the word "virgin" is no where to be found in a Human Sexuality text book or scientific report because, according to Sexologists, it's a term reffering to an absurd idea that doesn't even really exist.

[gevo]

Would just like to add that if you want to look at it from a scientific or academic standpoint, sexologists (YES, that's a real thing...) actually never ever use the term Virgin BECAUSE of conversations like thsi where people scramble to make their own definitions. So the word "virgin" is no where to be found in a Human Sexuality text book or scientific report because, according to Sexologists, it's a term reffering to an absurd idea that doesn't even really exist.

would just to add one more thing... maybe the sexologists are wrong?,,, just a thaught.

[Anonymouse]

Would just like to add that if you want to look at it from a scientific or academic standpoint, sexologists (YES, that's a real thing...) actually never ever use the term Virgin BECAUSE of conversations like thsi where people scramble to make their own definitions. So the word "virgin" is no where to be found in a Human Sexuality text book or scientific report because, according to Sexologists, it's a term reffering to an absurd idea that doesn't even really exist.

Sexology is one of those stupid liberal arts careers that was popularized after the 60s, but the original creator was nothing more than a Jew wanting to make a buck by milking stupid gentiles who fall for this guff. It means nothing, other than to perverts and sexual deviants whos only hang up is sex and astrological signs or reading the karma sutra as bathroom reading material for when you take a dump.

[HyeJinx1984]

No, they're about as accurate as you can get. Science can only be based on facts, and a word like "virgin" apparently has more meanings than any other word on the planet it seems. It would be an irresponsible thing to do to base a science upon such a relative term. I one person "If a guy has receieved head and nothing else, is he a virgin?" and that person may say no. I ask someone else the same question and they say "yes"... how can you base a science off that? So they don't use the wors "virgin," they say "Person who hasn't had coitus yet"... and. No confusion. No room for interpretation. It means what it means with no reletivism involved. That's a accurate, responsible, scientific approach, which I agree with. And considering they're PhDs in this field and we're all just "guys with an opinion" here, I think they are probably more right than we are.

[HyeJinx1984]

I'd also like to add that I'm a pervert and sexual devient, so it means something to me

[Anonymouse]

No, they're about as accurate as you can get. Science can only be based on facts, and a word like "virgin" apparently has more meanings than any other word on the planet it seems. It would be an irresponsible thing to do to base a science upon such a relative term. I one person "If a guy has receieved head and nothing else, is he a virgin?" and that person may say no. I ask someone else the same question and they say "yes"... how can you base a science off that? So they don't use the wors "virgin," they say "Person who hasn't had coitus yet"... and. No confusion. No room for interpretation. It means what it means with no reletivism involved. That's a accurate, responsible, scientific approach, which I agree with. And considering they're PhDs in this field and we're all just "guys with an opinion" here, I think they are probably more right than we are.

Oh wow and this is your uber genius at display telling me how "it is accurate and based on science". Science is how society perceives itself. A few hundred years ago Newtonian physics was "science" but now it isn't accepted.