Flat Earth/Heliocentrism

[KanadaHye]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

So you want advancement, but you just don't want to spend neither time nor money. Makes perfect sense.

Uhm... if you haven't noticed your country is going back about 200 yrs thanks to "science". How is that for advancement?

And the wonderful irony of that is that you are the one who said that "alternative treatments" like Reiki should get research funding.

I'd like to see a quote where I said this. You again are hallucinating on those brownies. If liberal-atheist-scientists can swindle funding to make up crap then I think it's only fair that smaller snake oil producers get a piece of the pie.

[Siggie]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Uhm... if you haven't noticed your country is going back about 200 yrs thanks to "science". How is that for advancement?

Going back 200 years in what respect? US is not in great shape for a lot of reasons, but too much science is not one of them. If anything it's due to a lack thereof. Besides, I don't know where this year estimate comes from anyway. You can't just state that like fact. "Why doesn't everybody know the US has regressed precisely 200 years?!" So again... Going back 200 years in what respect/way? Explain.

I'd like to see a quote where I said this. You again are hallucinating on those brownies. If liberal-atheist-scientists can swindle funding to make up crap then I think it's only fair that smaller snake oil producers get a piece of the pie.

See quote in above post... I accept written apologies only.

And purely for entertainment purposes and because I want to encourage the Fizzixist to return... Please tell me what liberal-atheist-scientists (so many "bad" words, oh my!) have made up with swindled funding.
Though, I can't say that I have very high hopes for this... You still didn't really explain how relativity is wrong (I'd like to see it "fixed" and with math that still works out).

[Sip]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Uhm... if you haven't noticed your country is going back about 200 yrs thanks to "science". How is that for advancement?

Don't make me throw up my tequilla shot from yesterday.

[Siggie]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Don't make me throw up my tequilla shot from yesterday.

Hahahah! Tetvatsrar?

[Sip]

Re: Flat Earth/Heliocentrism

... almost

[HotFizzixist]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Uhm... if you haven't noticed your country is going back about 200 yrs thanks to "science". How is that for advancement?




I'd like to see a quote where I said this. You again are hallucinating on those brownies. If liberal-atheist-scientists can swindle funding to make up crap then I think it's only fair that smaller snake oil producers get a piece of the pie.

I must say, KanadaHye, you are quite an expert in ignoring a direct comment and starting a new, barely relevant discussion stream. Siggie pointed out that your statements were in contradiction with each other, and you responded with what is basically a non-sequitur. Acknowledge the point and move on.

Regarding your statement in Post #47: if anything, precisely the opposite is true. Once a physical theory is proposed (like the one mentioned in the article you posted about whether or not time is a dimension in its own right), experiments must be performed to determine if the theory's predictions are consistent with reality. If sufficient evidence stands in contradiction to the theory's predictions, the theorists go back to work and come up with a new theory, and the cycle repeats. *That's advancement.* If the evidence, on the other hand, concurs with the theory's predictions, *we've advanced.*

[Sip]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

If sufficient evidence stands in contradiction to the theory's predictions, the theorists go back to work and come up with a new theory, and the cycle repeats. *That's advancement.* If the evidence, on the other hand, concurs with the theory's predictions, *we've advanced.*

Well said.

[KanadaHye]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Going back 200 years in what respect? US is not in great shape for a lot of reasons, but too much science is not one of them. If anything it's due to a lack thereof. Besides, I don't know where this year estimate comes from anyway. You can't just state that like fact. "Why doesn't everybody know the US has regressed precisely 200 years?!" So again... Going back 200 years in what respect/way? Explain.

Wait and see for yourself.

See quote in above post... I accept written apologies only.

That wasn't my quote, that was from the website. I know communication isn't your strong point.

And purely for entertainment purposes and because I want to encourage the Fizzixist to return...

Your alter ego?

I must say, KanadaHye, you are quite an expert in ignoring a direct comment and starting a new, barely relevant discussion stream. Siggie pointed out that your statements were in contradiction with each other, and you responded with what is basically a non-sequitur. Acknowledge the point and move on.

Regarding your statement in Post #47: if anything, precisely the opposite is true. Once a physical theory is proposed (like the one mentioned in the article you posted about whether or not time is a dimension in its own right), experiments must be performed to determine if the theory's predictions are consistent with reality. If sufficient evidence stands in contradiction to the theory's predictions, the theorists go back to work and come up with a new theory, and the cycle repeats. *That's advancement.* If the evidence, on the other hand, concurs with the theory's predictions, *we've advanced.*

[Siggie]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Wait and see for yourself.

No, I insist. If you're not full of bovine excrement, I encourage you to explain your statement.

That wasn't my quote, that was from the website. I know communication isn't your strong point.

It links to that thread. Go read it. You were saying funding is biased and those effective and cheaper alternatives aren't researched. That is the contradiction. In that case you criticized because that wasn't being researched and now you complain about wasting money.

Your alter ego?

Because anyone who agrees with me, must be me. I must be supertalented to post on both accounts simultaneously.

[bell-the-cat]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

I must be supertalented to post on both accounts simultaneously.

Or have you been bending space-time again, Siggie?