Flat Earth/Heliocentrism

[Siggie]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

I'm going to do some Gegev style formatting...

You need a shrink.

You need to be less obvious when you're had and begin avoiding questions by throwing smoke bombs of distraction (jokes and irrelevant tangential at best distractions).


Answer the 3 questions that you've avoided at least twice now... SEE BELOW
Well, it's two questions really... I don't care about the 3rd, so much.

1) Explain what you meant by or how it is that science has pushed the US back 200 years.
Your quoted statement and the subsequent requests that you explain yourself and your avoidance in doing so are documented in quotes below.

2) Explain why you think Einstein's relativity is wrong.

3) I pointed out that contradiction in statements and you never acknowledged it. This I care about least... I posted the quotes already, so whatever. You don't need to admit it for people to see it's true.

Just answer the first 2 questions.


------

Uhm... if you haven't noticed your country is going back about 200 yrs thanks to "science". How is that for advancement?

Going back 200 years in what respect? US is not in great shape for a lot of reasons, but too much science is not one of them. If anything it's due to a lack thereof. Besides, I don't know where this year estimate comes from anyway. You can't just state that like fact. "Why doesn't everybody know the US has regressed precisely 200 years?!" So again... Going back 200 years in what respect/way? Explain.

You still didn't really explain how relativity is wrong (I'd like to see it "fixed" and with math that still works out).

Wait and see for yourself.

No, I insist. If you're not full of bovine excrement, I encourage you to explain your statement.

[KanadaHye]

Re: Flat Earth/Heliocentrism

Ya got me! That's how I was able to post at the same, from different accounts, ip addresses, and states.

Curvature of space-time + wormhole = time travel

In all seriousness though, I am only a fizzixist in my dreams. Therefore, either (1) this is all my dream (in which case YAY ME, I'm a brilliant fizzixist) or (2) we're indeed different people.

You need a shrink.

[Siggie]

Re: Flat Earth/Heliocentrism

Or have you been bending space-time again, Siggie?

hahaha

Ya got me! That's how I was able to post at the same, from different accounts, ip addresses, and states.

Curvature of space-time + wormhole = time travel

In all seriousness though, I am only a fizzixist in my dreams. Therefore, either (1) this is all my dream (in which case YAY ME, I'm a brilliant fizzixist) or (2) we're indeed different people.

[Sip]

Re: Flat Earth/Heliocentrism

hahaha

[bell-the-cat]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

I must be supertalented to post on both accounts simultaneously.

Or have you been bending space-time again, Siggie?

[Siggie]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Wait and see for yourself.

No, I insist. If you're not full of bovine excrement, I encourage you to explain your statement.

That wasn't my quote, that was from the website. I know communication isn't your strong point.

It links to that thread. Go read it. You were saying funding is biased and those effective and cheaper alternatives aren't researched. That is the contradiction. In that case you criticized because that wasn't being researched and now you complain about wasting money.

Your alter ego?

Because anyone who agrees with me, must be me. I must be supertalented to post on both accounts simultaneously.

[KanadaHye]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Going back 200 years in what respect? US is not in great shape for a lot of reasons, but too much science is not one of them. If anything it's due to a lack thereof. Besides, I don't know where this year estimate comes from anyway. You can't just state that like fact. "Why doesn't everybody know the US has regressed precisely 200 years?!" So again... Going back 200 years in what respect/way? Explain.

Wait and see for yourself.

See quote in above post... I accept written apologies only.

That wasn't my quote, that was from the website. I know communication isn't your strong point.

And purely for entertainment purposes and because I want to encourage the Fizzixist to return...

Your alter ego?

I must say, KanadaHye, you are quite an expert in ignoring a direct comment and starting a new, barely relevant discussion stream. Siggie pointed out that your statements were in contradiction with each other, and you responded with what is basically a non-sequitur. Acknowledge the point and move on.

Regarding your statement in Post #47: if anything, precisely the opposite is true. Once a physical theory is proposed (like the one mentioned in the article you posted about whether or not time is a dimension in its own right), experiments must be performed to determine if the theory's predictions are consistent with reality. If sufficient evidence stands in contradiction to the theory's predictions, the theorists go back to work and come up with a new theory, and the cycle repeats. *That's advancement.* If the evidence, on the other hand, concurs with the theory's predictions, *we've advanced.*

[Sip]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

If sufficient evidence stands in contradiction to the theory's predictions, the theorists go back to work and come up with a new theory, and the cycle repeats. *That's advancement.* If the evidence, on the other hand, concurs with the theory's predictions, *we've advanced.*

Well said.

[HotFizzixist]

Re: I am an Azeri and GAY. Not sure if feminine or masculine.

Uhm... if you haven't noticed your country is going back about 200 yrs thanks to "science". How is that for advancement?




I'd like to see a quote where I said this. You again are hallucinating on those brownies. If liberal-atheist-scientists can swindle funding to make up crap then I think it's only fair that smaller snake oil producers get a piece of the pie.

I must say, KanadaHye, you are quite an expert in ignoring a direct comment and starting a new, barely relevant discussion stream. Siggie pointed out that your statements were in contradiction with each other, and you responded with what is basically a non-sequitur. Acknowledge the point and move on.

Regarding your statement in Post #47: if anything, precisely the opposite is true. Once a physical theory is proposed (like the one mentioned in the article you posted about whether or not time is a dimension in its own right), experiments must be performed to determine if the theory's predictions are consistent with reality. If sufficient evidence stands in contradiction to the theory's predictions, the theorists go back to work and come up with a new theory, and the cycle repeats. *That's advancement.* If the evidence, on the other hand, concurs with the theory's predictions, *we've advanced.*

[Sip]

Re: Flat Earth/Heliocentrism

... almost