Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

World Cup 2006

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • theServant
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by TigranJamharian
    Even the commentator said it? who gives a damn what the commentator said, they dont even know what they are talking about half the time, especially that young nazi loving bastard on espn, makes the stupidest calls on everything and always disagrees with the refs during the halftime show.

    Yeah italy played superb against Germany...moron, why dont you go replay the 119 initial minutes of the game. And while you are at it go and replay the "diving" as you call it. woww... who dont you all stop sucking those guidos' koks. yeah they won good for them, just dont try to pretend they played well or better than france in that final match. and they hype themselves up enough without you morons blowing more wind in their sails.
    I don't see why you feel you need to make it personal.

    And yes Italy did play better OVERALL in both games, I just say it like I see it and the Italian football team is not my favourite so I am not biased...

    Leave a comment:


  • Anahita
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by Tomservo
    Go Italy.
    Originally posted by Anahita
    Go Costa Rica! You'll kick Germany's butts...
    er... oh... hmmm... Go Italy?
    Yeah. No mierda!

    Leave a comment:


  • Anonymouse
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by TigranJamharian
    yeah ok, thanks for the lecture.
    I'm serious, calm down, there's no reason for you to be up in arms.

    Leave a comment:


  • TJ
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by Anonymouse
    Okay, you are getting a little toooo personal regarding this topic. Just cool it man.
    yeah ok, thanks for the lecture.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anonymouse
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by TigranJamharian
    Even the commentator said it? who gives a damn what the commentator said, they dont even know what they are talking about half the time, especially that young nazi loving bastard on espn, makes the stupidest calls on everything and always disagrees with the refs during the halftime show.

    Yeah italy played superb against Germany...moron, why dont you go replay the 119 initial minutes of the game. And while you are at it go and replay the "diving" as you call it. woww... who dont you all stop sucking those guidos' koks. yeah they won good for them, just dont try to pretend they played well or better than france in that final match. and they hype themselves up enough without you morons blowing more wind in their sails.
    Okay, you are getting a little toooo personal regarding this topic. Just cool it man.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anonymouse
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by TigranJamharian
    you are the one that started talking about who deserved to win.
    scuffles and the physical aspect are part of the game, take that out and you will have something similar to the NBA and we all see how exciting that is nowadays.

    FYI, "that stupid English player" was Rooney.
    Who said scuffles aren't part of the game? I specifically stated so and that my gripe wasn't about those. You can still play with scuffles but play with finesse and class, France didn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • TJ
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by JenMinassian
    Interesting that France sucked in 2002...where was Zidane then???????????
    yeah...btw there, i hope you realize Zidane was injured for most of the 2002 world cup. i guess that answers your question. hahahhaa

    Leave a comment:


  • TJ
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by theServant
    Those who are saying France should of won:

    If the referee was decent, they wouldn't have made it past 90 minutes since their only goal was from a penalty which was won by DIVING. even the commentators said it. Wow, just like the Portugal match...

    Can they even score legitimately?


    Italy on the other hand played a great game and if you see how great they played against Germany you know they deserved to win.
    Even the commentator said it? who gives a damn what the commentator said, they dont even know what they are talking about half the time, especially that young nazi loving bastard on espn, makes the stupidest calls on everything and always disagrees with the refs during the halftime show.

    Yeah italy played superb against Germany...moron, why dont you go replay the 119 initial minutes of the game. And while you are at it go and replay the "diving" as you call it. woww... who dont you all stop sucking those guidos' koks. yeah they won good for them, just dont try to pretend they played well or better than france in that final match. and they hype themselves up enough without you morons blowing more wind in their sails.

    Leave a comment:


  • TJ
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by Anonymouse
    I'll tell you what short stuff. If France played the better game, they would have won.

    The fact that Italy won means everything. Who cares what happens in the middle, when it is the end result that counts? If you want to talk about luck, France was very lucky to have gotten that penalty shot in the beginning several minutes. At least Italy scored an actual goal within the game. I have siad this before and I will say it again, it takes no skill to shoot penalties as they are not a true determining factor of game play. If France was so good they would have penetrated the Italian defense and they would have scored, and let's not forget that the Italians were very tired by the end.

    The officiating was crap, and I am not talking about all those regular scuffles and pushes that occur during the game. Elbows to the head and legs to the shin are not your regular push and France played far more of a dirty game than Italy and the pinnacle of that was Zidane's idiocy on the field.

    This isn't rugby and this isn't UFC, that shyt isn't for the game. It's the same with that stupid English player in the England vs. Portugal game. No matter what the Italian player said, nothing excuses Zidane's idiocy. Phuck him, it's his fault in a way that France lost one can argue. If he thought rationally, he wouldn't have done anything and he would have stayed until the penalty shootouts when he would have been asset to France.

    And finally, stop making stupid excuses and take your god damn loss with some pride.
    you are the one that started talking about who deserved to win.
    scuffles and the physical aspect are part of the game, take that out and you will have something similar to the NBA and we all see how exciting that is nowadays.

    FYI, "that stupid English player" was Rooney.

    Leave a comment:


  • TJ
    replied
    Re: World Cup 2006

    Originally posted by JenMinassian
    HEHEHEEH too bad that no matter what, Italy is the champion and Zidane A$$ is retiring...arghhh...can't stand him...






    You forgot to mention that he will be compared to the best players like Pele, Maradona aka Vaccum Cleaner, Ronaldo, Ronaldinho... that will never happen....

    Interesting that France sucked in 2002...where was Zidane then???????????
    rondaldo and ronaldinho are nothing compared to him

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X