Tweet
Re: Armenia and Dagestan
Well thanks for saying this too. I read it too somewhere, and it might be a little more complex then we might look at it at first.
You see Chechen and Ingush language has lots of similar words with Armenian although we are two different language groups. Perhaps it comes from Urartu days or even earlier. And you see, if you read information about the 8 sons of Togarmah (which I mentioned above) they too are Noahs descendants just like us and some other Caucasian people.
Perhaps that's why we are the original Caucasians instead of that term being used to describe all white Europeans. So what my point is, that this could be one of these words that not only sounds the same, but has same meaning? I wonder what Nakh means in their language, because that's what they call themselves. After all they also lived in Urartu and even lived there before Urartu as Pre-Chechen as well as Pre-Armenians lived there. So we never know.
Ofcourse everyone want it being THEIR meaning, but lets face it - there could be connections that we are not aware of. And I am not saying that Nakhichevan is not an Armenian land. I'll always be on Armenian side. I am just saying that there could be much more connection the population around us then an ordinary Armenian is aware of.
Originally posted by hrai
View Post
I read somewhere that chechens (!) claim descent directly from Noah and that Nakhichevan is from chechen language.
People without culture, history or morals will try to steal and hi-jack a culture, a history from others.
People without culture, history or morals will try to steal and hi-jack a culture, a history from others.
You see Chechen and Ingush language has lots of similar words with Armenian although we are two different language groups. Perhaps it comes from Urartu days or even earlier. And you see, if you read information about the 8 sons of Togarmah (which I mentioned above) they too are Noahs descendants just like us and some other Caucasian people.
Perhaps that's why we are the original Caucasians instead of that term being used to describe all white Europeans. So what my point is, that this could be one of these words that not only sounds the same, but has same meaning? I wonder what Nakh means in their language, because that's what they call themselves. After all they also lived in Urartu and even lived there before Urartu as Pre-Chechen as well as Pre-Armenians lived there. So we never know.
Ofcourse everyone want it being THEIR meaning, but lets face it - there could be connections that we are not aware of. And I am not saying that Nakhichevan is not an Armenian land. I'll always be on Armenian side. I am just saying that there could be much more connection the population around us then an ordinary Armenian is aware of.
Comment