Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

History of Indo-European Languages...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Tres Bien
    actually i made a spelling misstake - i meant gjughtsi armenian, or i dont know what else to call it-"simple" armenian- words like xi, karas etc. Weve have had this discusion in another thread If i recall correcly.


    Yes i know about the Jughtsiz very well. and i wouldnt exacly call it "simple" labour if you saw what they achieved in iran.
    But I wasnt saying they were incompetent, hahaha omg wow it is true that you really do not read. YES HAHAHAH that is precisely my point. Of course they have ACHIEVED A LOT it is in our blood to do so. That is not my point and you obviously are too deficient to see that. My point was that they were FORCED AGAINST THEIR WILL there by Persians you twit. What they accomplished is another story and yes they did that who said that they didnt?

    That is like saying "you would not call the Blacks simple force if you see what they have planted and all of the great crop plantations they have achieved." Yes we know that but the essence of that is that they were brought there forcibly by your gods you worship aka persians and arabs.

    As for the villagers, well they speak with a broken slang and we already have established that and we know it. It is colloqualism that they use and yes in every language you have those that always tend to speak every language with slang, of course that needs fixing but that is not the worst of our problems here.

    Comment


    • #42
      My argument was to acknowledge and target this wrath to where it really belongs not just to Turks but to Persians as well. They stand no more or less guilty than anyone.

      Comment


      • #43
        You are in America now, wake up. You have a voice and freedom now that you parskahyes and all of the other "hyes" can use as well. No ridiculous Iranian extremist will come along the way and slit your necks for it, fear not. You don't need to fake pretend you love an ethnicity that wants your heads on sticks. This place is a lot more civil than that and you have a right to be upset at Arabs Persians Turks as much as you can and want. Blacks do it, we can as well. Native Americans do it, we can as well.

        Comment


        • #44
          Is the argument over now, Tresbien? I bet your whole cause and motive with these posts was to stick up for Parskahyes as arbitrary as that sounds, only because your simple-mind thought I was attacking them huh? You thought I was going about putting down parskahyes which is thus why you all of a sudden took matters into your own hands and said what you said: "If you only see what they achieved." :laughs:

          Comment


          • #45
            I am not parskahay , i am a sheveda-hay, and ive never been to iran, wich makes you a laughing fool.

            Comment


            • #46
              Where did I say YOU specifically are a "Parskahye?" You are a what? A "shveda-hay?" Meaning supposedly from Sweden? Even if you were or werent it would not matter. Trust me, the Armenians in these Northern European nations are largely parskahyes that settled there. Either "parskahyes" or "bolsahyes" and that exemplifies you as a fool which is of no surprise.

              Comment


              • #47
                The hole population of sheveda hay armenians are fools. Listen to this guy
                Maybe im a fool, sometimes can BE A FOOL for discussing stupid things like this with you, but why offense all "sheveda-hayer", be it parskahay bolsahay or whatever they might be. Everyone is not shaped in one format.

                this was my last comment
                Last edited by Tres Bien; 07-25-2004, 09:52 PM.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Archetype8
                  Armenian is an Indo-European language. Indo-European= Asiatic & European languages combined. Indo-Sanskrit, Farsi, Urdu. European- Armenian Gaelic Italian German etc.

                  Indo-European does NOT mean Asiatic & European languages combined, that's just not the correct way of classifying languages, linguistically speaking. In fact, in the science of Linguistics Asiatic is a completely different subgroup from Indo-European and includes language like Turkish etc. Furthermore, there is no Asian and European classification within the Indo-European subgroup. There are simply branches like Slavic, Germanic etc. It was earlier mentioned also that Armenian is a link between European and Asian, another unscientific subjective fact. Armenian has a branch of it's own and the only known languages in the branch are Dacian and Thracian, languages which are both extinct today. It is known that Armenian has many borrowed words from Persian and at one point linguists around the world classified Armenian as a dialect of Persian, however later it was scientifically proven that Armenian belongs to a distinct branch and furthermore based on this we can say that our linguistic ancestor came down to Anatolia from the Balkans (around Thrace). They assimilated with the local inhabitants who called themselves Hayasa (thus we call ourselves HYE) and the language of the Armens mixed with Hayasa language became our language. The beauty and sadness of this is that Armenians as a nation formed in Anatolia and continued living there for thousands and thousands of years only to be erased by Ottoman Turks in early 20th century.
                  Last edited by kikki88; 08-03-2004, 09:42 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    One of the best websited to read about the IE languages is here

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Thank you for reposting the link.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X