Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Agriculture

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vrej1915
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Ծիրանենին ցրտահարվել է, բայց վաղ է ասել, որ բերք չի լինի
    Գրիշա Բալասանյան

    13:24, 27 մարտի, 2013
    Մարտի 24-ի լույս 25-ի գիշերը Արարատյան դաշտավայրում ջերմաստիճանը իջել էր -1 եւ տեղ-տեղ նույնիսկ -3 աստիճան, ինչը անհետեւանք չի կարող մնալ գյուղատնտեսության, հատկապես` պտղատու ծառերի վրա, քանի որ ջերմաստիճանի նվազումը համընկել է ծիրանենիների ծաղկման փուլի հետ: Ծիրանենին ծաղկել է Արմավիրի եւ Արարատի մարզերում, եւ մյուս մազերում կարծես թե մտահոգվելու առիթ չկա:

    Գյուղատնտեսության փոխնախարար Գառնիկ Պետրոսյանը «Հետքի» հետ զրույցում ասաց, որ ցրտահարության օրն ինքն անձամբ է հեռուստատեսությամբ գյուղացիներին բացատրել, թե ինչպես կարելի է պաշտպանիչ միջոցառումներ կիրառելով բերքը փրկել: Գյուղնախարարը նույնպես եղել է մարզերում եւ խորհրդատուների ու մարզպետարանի վարչության պետերի մակարդակով բացատրական աշխատանքներ տարել:

    «Բնականաբար, ինչպես հաճախ է պատահում, ոչ բոլորն են այդ խորհուրդներին հետեւել, բայց շատերը հետեւել են եւ ծխեցումով հնարավոր է մինչեւ 100 տոկոսանոց արդյունք ապահովել»,- ասաց Գառնիկ Պետրոսյանը:

    Փոխնախարարի ասելով՝ աչքի համար որոշ հատվածներում ցրտահարությունն արդեն ակնհայտ է, բայց սպասվող բերքի վրա ինչպիսի՞ ազդեցություն կունենա` որեւէ մեկը չի կարող ասել:

    Ըստ նրան` հազարավոր ծաղիկներից եթե նույնիսկ 5 տոկոսը պտուղ տա, ապա ռեկորդային բերք կստացվի: Բացի դրանից՝ չի բացառվում, որ ցրտահարությունը որոշակի ֆունկցիոնալ փոփոխություններ առաջացրած լինի, ասենք` ծաղիկը փարթամ աճի, փոշոտում կատարվի, սակայն հետագայում պտուղ չտա, կամ պտուղը չմեծանա ու թափվի:

    Մոտ 20 օր հետո, երբ ավարտվի ծիրանենու ծաղկումը, եւ պտուղը աճի, այդ դեպքում հստակ կկարողանան գնահատական տալ:

    «Այս պահին չեմ կարծում, որ լուրջ մտահոգությունների առիթ կա, որ կորուստներ կունենանք եւ այլն, բայց ի՞նչ չափով կլինի՝ պարզ կլինի ավելի ուշ: Բողբոջած ծառերի մասով վտանգ չկա, ցրտահարությունը սպառնում է հողին հնարավորինս մոտ գտնվող ծաղիկներին»,- ասաց փոխնախարարը:

    Ըստ Հայպետհիդրոմետի տվյալներին՝ մինչեւ ամսի 31-ը բացասական ջերմաստիճան Արարատյան դաշտավայրում չի սպասվում: Գիշերը նվազագույնը կլինի +1 աստիճան, ինչը ցրտահարության վտանգ չի առաջացնում:

    «Բայց վտանգը դեռ չի վերացել, տարիներ են եղել, որ մինչեւ ապրիլի 22-ը ցրտահարության դեպքեր են եղել, այնպես որ դեռ վաղ է կանխատեսել, թե վտանգն անցավ»,- ավելացրեց Գառնիկ Պետրոսյանը:

    Leave a comment:


  • Vrej1915
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Photojournalist Karen Minasyan has traveled around Armenia’s wide sprawling plain overlooked by Biblical Mount Ararat to capture some of its spring bloom.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vrej1915
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Եղանակային տատանումները գյուղատնտեսությանը չեն վնասել. Գառնիկ Պետրոսյան



    Մարտ 22, 2013
    Մարտի առաջին կեսին տեղի ունեցած եղանակային կտրուկ տատանումներն առայժմ գյուղատնտեսությանը վնաս չեն հասցրել: Այդ մասին այսօր` մարտի 22-ին լրագրողների հետ հանդիպման ժամանակ ասաց ՀՀ գյուղատնտեսության փոխնախարար Գառնիկ Պետրոսյանը:

    Մասնավորապես` դիտարկումները ցույց են տալիս, որ Արարատյան դաշտի որոշ շրջաններում ծաղկած վաղահաս ծիրանիները եւ բացված խախողի տնկիները չեն տուժել: Բարեբախտաբար` չիրականացան նաեւ առատ տեղումների ու դրանց հետ կապված հեղեղումների վտանգները: Ըստ Գ. Պետրոսյանի` բարվոք վիճակում է նաեւ աշնանացանի ձմեռացման ընթացքը: Սակայն փոխնախարարը չհերքեց, որ մինչեւ ապրիլի վերջ դեռ եղանակային պայմանները կարող են անականկալներ մատուցել, ուստի դեռ վաղ է խոսել սպասվելիք բերքի մասին:

    Leave a comment:


  • Vrej1915
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Agriculture: Favorable conditions and better seed quality expected to increase crop production


    Hrach Berberyan, heading the farmers’ union, believes this year will be favorable for agriculture.

    “Five days are left before the crop year starts: the layer of snow was thicker this year as compared to last year, the only concern now is the possible April frostbite, but there are numerous means to “cushion” the negative climatic impact, they just need to be applied in practice. As for the water issue, I can say that last year had no deficit of humidity, but the water for some reason disappeared. This year just let them claim there is no water!” Berberyan told the press on Wednesday.

    Berberyan praised the government measures aimed at supporting farmers, however stressed that there is a need for serious legislative reforms.

    The government last week approved the oat, corn, millet, sainfoin (a forage grain) production development program for 2013, according to which 850 tons of spring-planted oat seeds, 11 tons of corn seeds, 37 tons of millet seeds and 530 tons of sainfoin seeds will be purchased from foreign and local producers and distributed to farmers at favorable terms. The government program is expected to enhance the sowing fields, increase the gross volume of crops and the farmer income. The government has allotted more than 700 million drams (around $1.7 million) to the purchase of seeds.

    “The selling price to the villagers will be lower than the market price, plus we are going to subsidize 40 percent of it,” Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan stated.

    Last year the government gave wheat seeds to farmers with a condition to return by 2:1 kg ratio, however the seeds were low-quality, hence did not yield good crops. Berberyan is hopeful this year things won’t repeat.

    According to Berberyan, the post-election unrest will not interfere with villagers’ work. (There had been speculation that villagers may get caught up in protests that might interfere with seasonal work.)

    “Agriculture is stable, we don’t like tribulations. In Ararat plain the land workers will be in the fields and orchards in some 10 days, so no ‘shocks’ can affect the development of agriculture. A villager wants to work and earn his family’s living, nothing else,” said Berberyan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vrej1915
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Originally posted by Vahram View Post
    From the link above,
    Exact,
    from the the very start, the Iranians are as interested as we are.
    There is no question about.
    Things are not so clear on the russian side, to say the least. Their signing of Astara option was not the posture of a strategic partner they are supposed to be, when you consider the vital nature of Vartenis/Tchougha for us.
    As a matter of fact, a "rich" Baku was not interested in the project for the economic royalties it would generate, as much as reinforcing the blokada of Armenia, by delaying for decades the Armenian/Iranian link.
    A target they achieved at least partially, by delaying a minimum of 10 years the project, if we consider 2004-2013...

    As pointed again and again, till now Russia often misbehaved, if we consider their supposed obligation/consideration to our national interests, as "strategic partners"...
    Signing of Astara deal was a serious blow to our interests, as was the delivery of S-300s, etc...

    The irony is, that at the end of the day, the expediency of the "our" railway depends pretty much form the Georgians.
    If they do loose more time on the Abkhazian sector's opening, they might loose not only the royalties of Armenia/Russia transit, they would get certainly, plus the political and geostrategical importance they lost partly because the closure, but more so the Bandar-Abas /Russia + Central Asia/Russia Royalties, for ever, since that traffic will go via Astara...

    In conclusion: The opening of Abkhazian section might be seen slightly differently on a broader view, and the urgency may well be in Georgian side too...

    Leave a comment:


  • Vahram
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    From the link above,

    This fact and prospect is appreciated not only by the Iranians but also by the Chinese who are interested in the building of Iran-Armenia railway.
    it should be taken into consideration that Iran-Armenia railway will connect two other transportation hubs – Bender-Abas and Georgian Black Sea Poti port.

    It is obvious that the Iranian party is very interested in Iran-Armenia project from political point of view, because Armenia and Georgia for Iran is one thing and Azerbaijan is the other thing. There are practically no chances to improve the Iranian-Azerbaijani relations the deteriorated over the last year because such an improvement is hampered by both “Iranian policy” of Azerbaijan, and failure of the policy of establishment of active Iranian-Turkish cooperation. And change of the leadership in Georgia created grounds for Tehran to expect that the “Georgian road” to Russia can be opened, thus creating serious alternative to the road going through Azerbaijan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vrej1915
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Originally posted by Vahram View Post
    If this railroad is going to be built, what a better way to ruin this by having an issue with smelly animals! Who but the Joo wins by this? Are we just listening to one make up story and forgetting the rest?



    Again who wins?

    No railroad for you, you can't even discuss sheep, so said the joo. Did not think you were this lost as to go with the flow this easily! With this said one more time, please step back and think again. Because if you think wrong no railroad for you, so please be careful, you will do worse then just hurt my feelings you just might make the joo really happy! So don't enjoy yourself too much, the more you enjoy it the happier you make the joo!


    Getze Hayastan!
    Սևակ Սարուխանյան Վերջին շրջանում Հարավային Կովկասում և Հայաստանում ակտիվացել են երկաթուղային ոլորտի զարգացման վերաբերյալ քննարկումները։ Դրանք մեծ մասամբ պայմանավորված են նրանով, որ 2012-ին Վրաստանում տեղի է ունեցել իշխանափոխություն, որի արդյունքում ձևավորվել է նոր կառավարություն։

    Leave a comment:


  • bell-the-cat
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    I'd like to see some thoughts/opinions on Armenia leasing some land in Syunik to Iran for sheep grazing.
    I don't think these news stories have been posted here.

    Demonstrators Demand a Halt to Planned Leasing of Syunik Pasture Lands to Iran
    Narek Aleksanyan

    Demonstrators assembled in front of the Armenian Government building in Yerevan to voice their opposition regarding any plan to lease pasture land in Armenia’s southern Syunik Province to Iranian sheepherders.

    February 14, 2013


    Demonstrators assembled in front of the Armenian Government building
    in Yerevan to voice their opposition regarding any plan to lease
    pasture land in Armenia's southern Syunik Province to Iranian
    sheepherders.

    Holding signs that read `Nomadic Animal Herders Have No Business in
    Syounik', protest participants argued that is rife with security,
    demographic and environmental risks.

    They said that such a plan, much bandied about in the Armenian press
    would hurt the domestic livestock industry and was being promoted by a
    small group of businessmen looking to make a profit at the expense of
    national interests.

    Other signs on display read `Not One Arab Sheep in Syunik' and `Let's
    Protect the Lands Saved by Nzhdeh from the Nzhdeh Poseurs of Today'.

    Armen Mkrtchyan, a member of the board of the Hayazni NGO, which
    organized the protest, told Hetq that if the planned 50, 000 hectares
    for lease were concentrated in one locale the threats wouldn't be as
    great.

    `But Armenia doesn't have such a large expanse of pastureland in one
    area. Patches of land here and there will be destroyed by the
    rummaging sheep that eat the grass, roots and all. The land soon dries
    up.'

    Armen Hovhannisyan, another Hayazni activist, said the environmental
    ramifications would be disastrous.

    `We are diametrically opposed to any such step that further threatens
    the natural environment of Armenia. We view that environment as one
    where we will have to live, create a culture and develop statehood.'

    The demonstrators handed a copy of their demands to the government
    reception office. In their letter, they promised to follow-up on the
    issue and see to it that similar issues are nipped in the bud.


    Herding Controversy: Environmentalists warn against leasing grazing land to Iranians


    14.02.13

    NAZIK ARMENAKYAN
    ArmeniaNow

    By GOHAR ABRAHAMYAN
    ArmeniaNow reporter

    The possible lease of grazing lands in Armenian's southern Syunik
    province to neighboring Iran continues to be a matter of concern among
    environmentalists and some politicians, who held an act of protest
    Thursday in front of the government building demanding to annul the
    deal.

    The Ecolur environmental NGO posted two documents on its site earlier
    this month, one of which is titled `Memorandum of understanding
    between Iran's Eastern Atrapatakan (Eastern Azerbaijan) province and
    RA Syunik province'. The NGO especially highlights Point 3 in this
    document signed by the governors of Syunik and Eastern Atrapatakan on
    July, 2012: `The Iranian side has expressed its willingness to use the
    pastures and agricultural farming lands.' The second document was
    signed on January 15, 2013, during the Armenian delegation's visit to
    the Eastern Atrapatakan and is called an Agreement. In particular, it
    becomes clear that Iranians want to rent 50,000 hectares of grazing
    land for the minimum of 10 years and pay $25 per hectare of land per
    month. An additional 2,000 ha would be given as settlement area.

    Wednesday Iranian Ambassador in Armenia Mohammad Raeisi told the press
    that no lease agreement has been signed between Syunik and Iran's
    Eastern Azerbaijani provinces concerning the Syunik pastures. He said
    the issue has to be discussed, and should an agreement be signed, the
    parliaments of both countries have to approve it.

    During the Thursday cabinet meeting an act of protest was held in
    front of the government building during which members of Hayazn Union
    (nationalist organization) submitted a letter for the government
    consideration with their strong concerns over the potential deal.

    Hayazn press secretary Armen Hovhannisyan told the press that a deal
    of such scale and content `creates a set of threats in terms of
    national security, demography, environmental protection and other.'

    `From the environmental point of view this deal will have catastrophic
    consequences, because in an area where sheep breeding is the main type
    of livestock husbandry, the grass layer vanishes shortly, recovering
    it takes huge investment, and natural recovery takes 500-1,000 years,'
    says Hovhannisyan adding that the deal will not be of serious economic
    value to compensate for the damage.

    Environmentalist Silva Adamyan says besides the environmental issues
    there are also more disturbing national security concerns.

    `I remember how the Azerbaijanis were quietly taking control of Syunik
    during the soviet years. We have liberated it, and now we want to give
    it to them again? Can't we really understand that it is the same
    Azeris - citizens of Iran - who would be coming back to Syunik, bring
    their families, and so the blood shed for those lands would turn out
    to be for nothing? It appears we are going back to where we started,'
    says Adamyan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vrej1915
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    ՊԵԿ-ի 160 աշխատակիցներ ստուգում են Սամվել Ալեքսանյանի ընկերությունները


    20 Փետրվար, 17:29 AMT
    Հայաստանի Հանրապետության կառավարությանն առընթեր պետեկամուտներևի կոմիտեն ուսումնասիրություններ անցկացնում պատգամավոր Սամվել Ալեքսանյանի հետ փոխկապակցված «Ալեքս Գրիգ» եւ «Լուսաստղ շուգր» ընկերություններում: Այդ մասին այսօր՝ փետրվարի 20-ին լրագրողների հետ հանդիպման ժամանակ ասաց ՊԵԿ ղեկավար Գագիկ Խաչատրյանը:

    Նրա խոսքով՝ ստուգվում է «Ալեքս Գրիգի» ողջ ցանցը, ու այդ գործընթացում ներգրավված է 160 աշխատակից:

    Գ. Խաչատրյանը նշեց նաեւ, որ շաքարավազի ներմուծումից մաքսային մուտքերը նվազել են այն պատճառով, որ ներկայում ներկրվում է շաքարավազի կիսաֆաբրիկատ, իսկ նախկինում՝ պատրաստի շաքարավազ: Կիսաֆաբրիկատն ազատված է ավելացված արժեքի հարկից եւ մաքսատուրքից, ի տարբերություն պատրաստի շաքարավազից:

    Լուրեր Հայաստանից - NEWS.am

    ____
    To resume, for a long period, Oligarkh N2 Lfig Samo praised his huge investment: the sugar factory in Chirag, supposed to revive the Jagntegh planting, and home grown sugar self sufficiency....
    He offered kopeks to the agricultures, and no one planted...to offer him cheap row material.
    Now we have the end word of the story: he did it to evade taxes, by avoiding import of sugar, in place importing "sugar concentrate...."

    Leave a comment:


  • Artashes
    replied
    Re: Agriculture

    Originally posted by londontsi View Post
    It is not a mistake since it is done deliberately.

    You need to see the decision maker�s vision to understand what I am saying.
    You should also see what is the chain of command.
    Also how much the people, the ordinary folk matter.

    The president appoints the marzbeds ( governor of the region) .
    Their power of decision making is absolute, like little princes.
    The present governor is Surik Khachatrian appointed by the current President.


    Some highlights of his record include.

    He has given public land to the local mining company for exploitation.
    The mining company is frequently accused of not paying (enough) taxes.

    He has decided to raise to the ground villages to make way for the mining company.

    He is a violent person if any body opposes him or his interests.
    An Armenian businesswoman claimed on Tuesday to have been assaulted by a regional governor notorious for reportedly violent conduct just days after accusing him of corruption and business-related fraud.


    Look at him punching the bussineswoman
    This video combines two sources of footage: 1) a news report from November 15, 2011, where Silva Hambardzumyan, a businesswoman, tells the journalist the det...


    AND NOW �leasing� this land ( more like territory) for grazing and occupation by the toorks.

    Despite all the natural wealth extracted locally Syunik province is classified as the poorest region of Armenia.

    When people say Armenians will not graze sheep, the statement is ridicules.
    Perhaps they will not graze sheep without improvement in their quality of life.
    The reason being the people above will be skimming too much of their results of their effort.
    Everything you said rings true and is dead on the money .
    One of the several points I was making is this --- The manipulator knows that this money will be grabbed at by the top thieves and the better part will be taken by them . The manipulator knows the poor can be enticed with hardly more than hope .
    None of that actually matters to the manipulator .
    This sheep thing is a ruse !!!
    The real goal is the building of villages & schools & mosques ...
    The number of years this deal is slated for , it's a Trojan horse !!!
    Also , too many sheep . Just my opinion , oh and a significant number of concerned intelligentsia , but that number of sheep will kill the land . The stress that kind of grazing puts on the land should be completely unacceptable , again in my opine .
    The people you spoke of and the system you pointed out is ripe for manipulation .
    I'm watching Serj NOW . This is a high stakes game and the President is under a lotta pressure .
    If he is the man I think he is ( I hope he is ) he will play it like he played the turks . He will play them along BUT will nix the deal somehow .
    I think he may be the only one out there right now that can actually play this weird and deadly game .

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X