Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

When we get East Anatolia back...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

    Originally posted by Elia
    Exactly how do we do this?
    By staying away from generalisations about Turks, and not speaking about them as if they are one people with one single opinion. Instead of saying "Turks are guilty of genocide", "Turks committed genocide", say "the Turkish government committed genocide". Also, not being racist and not being hostile towards their culture. Instead of mocking their traditions and customs, we should attack their political policies. We must stay civilized in the face of barbarism, or else we will be no different then the extremists in their society.


    Originally posted by IranianAzeri
    But I'm not really familiar with the armenian-turk conflict. Was there a war between them? I'm not saying that it would make the ethnical cleansing ok though, don't misinterpret me.
    Its a complex issue, so I'll try to keep it subjective and to the point. Armenians and Turks were generally friendly towards each other for the better part of 5 centuries. After the 1878 Russo-Turkish war, the large class of western-educated Armenians became more and more influenced by events like the French Revolution. They formed political parties (mostly outside of the Ottoman Empire) which were urging the Ottomans for better treatment, since at this time Armenians were not allowed to join the army, they had to pay extra taxes because they were non-Muslims in a Muslim empire, and other issues as well. As this was happening, Kurdish tribes all over eastern Anatolia were levying taxes on the Armenian population, and these "taxes" prevented Kurdish militias from attacking the Armenians (who were not armed because they were not allowed to join the army). So basically they were intimidating and stealing from them. The Ottoman authorities did close to nothing to prevent the mistreatment of Armenians, so Armenians kept pushing for reforms. In 1895, Sultan Abdul-Hamid II wanted to solve the Armenian question once and for all, and he sent the army and Kurdish militias to crush the Armenian reform movement. The end result was the massacre of over 200,000 Armenian civlians. Abdul-Hamid, at the time, was known in the west as a butcher of Armenians.

    In 1908, the Ottoman Empire was going through change. The Ottomans themselves wanted to replace Sultan Abdul-Hamid II and establish a constitution. The Armenians naturally supported this reform, and in 1908 the Young Turk Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) launched a coup on the Sultan and deposed him, establishing a constitution. The Armenians felt safe, the bloody Sultan had been removed, a constitution had been established, and Armenians were now allowed to join the military.

    While the Armenians still hoped to have further reforms (to ease the heavy taxation for being Christians, and the taxation from Kurdish tribes), they were content at the moment. However, things were not well for long. In 1909, just one year after the Armenians had supported their rise to power, the CUP responded to the call for reforms by massacring 30,000 Armenian civilians, mainly in the Adana province (Cilicia). In 1913, the more extreme elements of the CUP took over in a bloody coup, and the Ottoman Empire was now ruled by 3 main figures. Djemal Pasha (admiral of the navy), Enver Pasha (minister of war), and Talaat Pasha (minister of the interior). They were the very nationalist section of the CUP, and were supporters of Pan-Turkism.

    When WW1 broke out, the Ottomans chose to side with the Germans, and launched a preemptive strike against the Russian Empire through the Caucasus (remember, Armenia was split between the Ottoman and Russian Empires). The Ottomans believed they were going to be victorious, but their strike was disastrous. Out of the nearly 100,000 soldiers they sent to Russian Armenia, nearly 90% of them were wiped out due to poor preparation and the winter. The CUP blamed the Armenians for their loss, and started deporting all Armenians within their territories to prevent a small number of Armenians from crossing over to the Russian side (indeed some Armenians left the Ottoman Empire to fight for Russia, but you have to remember, in an occupied country, there is ALWAYS going to be SOME people who will fight against their government... Armenians even engaged in anti-Russian activities prior to WW1, but Russians never massacred them). All Armenians in the Ottoman army (tens of thousands of men), were disarmed, and forced into labor camps, where they were either worked to death or outright massacred. With most of the able-bodied Armenian men wiped out, they deported millions of women and children and elderly from east Anatolia to march through the Syrian desert with no supplies. Those that could not keep up with the group were massacred by the Turkish patrols who were "gaurding" them, and the Ottomans even released Kurdish prisoners to prey on the defenseless women and children on the marches. Out of a pre-war population of over 2 million, around 3/4 of them died from 1915-1923 (most of the casualties occured between 1915 and 1917, when Armenians still believed that the Ottomans were moving them for their own safety, since that is what they were told). I should also mention that the Ottomans disarmed the general Armenian population in 1915, and since many Armenians didn't have guns, they had to buy guns from their Turkish and Kurdish neighbors to give to the Ottomans since they would be punished if they didn't hand in anything.

    Comment


    • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

      Originally posted by Էլիա View Post
      Instead of reexplaining what I have stated in the past, I'll just copy a long explanation of the Armenian genocide and the explanations for the Turks' "rebuttals"... (by the way, this post isn't directed toward you, so there may be some things that aren't related to our topic...)
      Ok, thanks. As I said it was undoubtedly an ethnical cleansing. You can compare it to the bosnian-serbian conflict. It was a war, but the massacres in srebrenica and so on were ethnical cleansings anyway, even though bosnians fought. So there is not much to discuss anyway. Even if armenians made some resistance.

      I have never understood why the turks don't admit this. It wasn't even the same goverment, same politcians, or even the same generation. Why are they so stubborn ...

      By the way I think I've heard there were local turks who helped armenians who tried to flee or something ...

      Comment


      • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

        Originally posted by Iranianazeri View Post
        Ok, thanks. As I said it was undoubtedly an ethnical cleansing. You can compare it to the bosnian-serbian conflict. It was a war, but the massacres in srebrenica and so on were ethnical cleansings anyway, even though bosnians fought. So there is not much to discuss anyway. Even if armenians made some resistance.

        I have never understood why the turks don't admit this. It wasn't even the same goverment, same politcians, or even the same generation. Why are they so stubborn ...

        By the way I think I've heard there were local turks who helped armenians who tried to flee or something ...
        I am also very confused of why the Turkish government is being so hard-headed and not accepting the truth... Anyway, as for the local Turks helping Armenians flee, of course not all the Turks were against Armenians (at least I think), so I guess that would make sense.

        Comment


        • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

          Originally posted by Iranianazeri View Post
          I googled some about the genocide, and I don't really now much about it. But undoubtedly, it was an ethnical cleansing. I found this: http://www.theforgotten.org/

          The site has been hacked buy turk extremists. I wan't to ask you guys something, read this:




          What's your comments?
          'genocide' is word gymnastics to some. Yep you are right about the ethnic cleansing part. Now how about an ethnic cleansing where uprooted population is driven into physical conditions that do not sustain life.

          When it came to drafted fighting aged men though, it was just point blank murder.

          By the way, the Armenian fighters killed as many turks as they could. No doubt about that. I would have too.

          Comment


          • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

            Originally posted by ArmSurvival View Post
            By staying away from generalisations about Turks, and not speaking about them as if they are one people with one single opinion. Instead of saying "Turks are guilty of genocide", "Turks committed genocide", say "the Turkish government committed genocide". Also, not being racist and not being hostile towards their culture. Instead of mocking their traditions and customs, we should attack their political policies. We must stay civilized in the face of barbarism, or else we will be no different then the extremists in their society.




            Its a complex issue, so I'll try to keep it subjective and to the point. Armenians and Turks were generally friendly towards each other for the better part of 5 centuries. After the 1878 Russo-Turkish war, the large class of western-educated Armenians became more and more influenced by events like the French Revolution. They formed political parties (mostly outside of the Ottoman Empire) which were urging the Ottomans for better treatment, since at this time Armenians were not allowed to join the army, they had to pay extra taxes because they were non-Muslims in a Muslim empire, and other issues as well. As this was happening, Kurdish tribes all over eastern Anatolia were levying taxes on the Armenian population, and these "taxes" prevented Kurdish militias from attacking the Armenians (who were not armed because they were not allowed to join the army). So basically they were intimidating and stealing from them. The Ottoman authorities did close to nothing to prevent the mistreatment of Armenians, so Armenians kept pushing for reforms. In 1895, Sultan Abdul-Hamid II wanted to solve the Armenian question once and for all, and he sent the army and Kurdish militias to crush the Armenian reform movement. The end result was the massacre of over 200,000 Armenian civlians. Abdul-Hamid, at the time, was known in the west as a butcher of Armenians.

            In 1908, the Ottoman Empire was going through change. The Ottomans themselves wanted to replace Sultan Abdul-Hamid II and establish a constitution. The Armenians naturally supported this reform, and in 1908 the Young Turk Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) launched a coup on the Sultan and deposed him, establishing a constitution. The Armenians felt safe, the bloody Sultan had been removed, a constitution had been established, and Armenians were now allowed to join the military.

            While the Armenians still hoped to have further reforms (to ease the heavy taxation for being Christians, and the taxation from Kurdish tribes), they were content at the moment. However, things were not well for long. In 1909, just one year after the Armenians had supported their rise to power, the CUP responded to the call for reforms by massacring 30,000 Armenian civilians, mainly in the Adana province (Cilicia). In 1913, the more extreme elements of the CUP took over in a bloody coup, and the Ottoman Empire was now ruled by 3 main figures. Djemal Pasha (admiral of the navy), Enver Pasha (minister of war), and Talaat Pasha (minister of the interior). They were the very nationalist section of the CUP, and were supporters of Pan-Turkism.

            When WW1 broke out, the Ottomans chose to side with the Germans, and launched a preemptive strike against the Russian Empire through the Caucasus (remember, Armenia was split between the Ottoman and Russian Empires). The Ottomans believed they were going to be victorious, but their strike was disastrous. Out of the nearly 100,000 soldiers they sent to Russian Armenia, nearly 90% of them were wiped out due to poor preparation and the winter. The CUP blamed the Armenians for their loss, and started deporting all Armenians within their territories to prevent a small number of Armenians from crossing over to the Russian side (indeed some Armenians left the Ottoman Empire to fight for Russia, but you have to remember, in an occupied country, there is ALWAYS going to be SOME people who will fight against their government... Armenians even engaged in anti-Russian activities prior to WW1, but Russians never massacred them). All Armenians in the Ottoman army (tens of thousands of men), were disarmed, and forced into labor camps, where they were either worked to death or outright massacred. With most of the able-bodied Armenian men wiped out, they deported millions of women and children and elderly from east Anatolia to march through the Syrian desert with no supplies. Those that could not keep up with the group were massacred by the Turkish patrols who were "gaurding" them, and the Ottomans even released Kurdish prisoners to prey on the defenseless women and children on the marches. Out of a pre-war population of over 2 million, around 3/4 of them died from 1915-1923 (most of the casualties occured between 1915 and 1917, when Armenians still believed that the Ottomans were moving them for their own safety, since that is what they were told). I should also mention that the Ottomans disarmed the general Armenian population in 1915, and since many Armenians didn't have guns, they had to buy guns from their Turkish and Kurdish neighbors to give to the Ottomans since they would be punished if they didn't hand in anything.
            Thank you for that summary.

            I wonder what would happen if more liberal turks would have taken the power in 1913 ...

            Comment


            • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

              Originally posted by Էլիա View Post
              I am also very confused of why the Turkish government is being so hard-headed and not accepting the truth... Anyway, as for the local Turks helping Armenians flee, of course not all the Turks were against Armenians (at least I think), so I guess that would make sense.
              Because it helps in the legal precedent of restoring Armenian lands.

              Comment


              • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

                Originally posted by skhara View Post
                By the way, the Armenian fighters killed as many turks as they could. No doubt about that. I would have too.
                How do you mean, everyone, or just ottoman fighters?


                Originally posted by skhara View Post
                Because it helps in the legal precedent of restoring Armenian lands.
                "Restoring" armenian lands, how do you mean exactly?

                Comment


                • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

                  Originally posted by ArmSurvival View Post
                  By staying away from generalisations about Turks, and not speaking about them as if they are one people with one single opinion. Instead of saying "Turks are guilty of genocide", "Turks committed genocide", say "the Turkish government committed genocide". Also, not being racist and not being hostile towards their culture. Instead of mocking their traditions and customs, we should attack their political policies. We must stay civilized in the face of barbarism, or else we will be no different then the extremists in their society.
                  Actually, I already pretty much do that, and don't worry, I don't think all Turks are evil or anything like that.

                  Originally posted by ArmSurvival View Post
                  Its a complex issue, so I'll try to keep it subjective and to the point. Armenians and Turks were generally friendly towards each other for the better part of 5 centuries. After the 1878 Russo-Turkish war, the large class of western-educated Armenians became more and more influenced by events like the French Revolution. They formed political parties (mostly outside of the Ottoman Empire) which were urging the Ottomans for better treatment, since at this time Armenians were not allowed to join the army, they had to pay extra taxes because they were non-Muslims in a Muslim empire, and other issues as well. As this was happening, Kurdish tribes all over eastern Anatolia were levying taxes on the Armenian population, and these "taxes" prevented Kurdish militias from attacking the Armenians (who were not armed because they were not allowed to join the army). So basically they were intimidating and stealing from them. The Ottoman authorities did close to nothing to prevent the mistreatment of Armenians, so Armenians kept pushing for reforms. In 1895, Sultan Abdul-Hamid II wanted to solve the Armenian question once and for all, and he sent the army and Kurdish militias to crush the Armenian reform movement. The end result was the massacre of over 200,000 Armenian civlians. Abdul-Hamid, at the time, was known in the west as a butcher of Armenians.

                  In 1908, the Ottoman Empire was going through change. The Ottomans themselves wanted to replace Sultan Abdul-Hamid II and establish a constitution. The Armenians naturally supported this reform, and in 1908 the Young Turk Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) launched a coup on the Sultan and deposed him, establishing a constitution. The Armenians felt safe, the bloody Sultan had been removed, a constitution had been established, and Armenians were now allowed to join the military.

                  While the Armenians still hoped to have further reforms (to ease the heavy taxation for being Christians, and the taxation from Kurdish tribes), they were content at the moment. However, things were not well for long. In 1909, just one year after the Armenians had supported their rise to power, the CUP responded to the call for reforms by massacring 30,000 Armenian civilians, mainly in the Adana province (Cilicia). In 1913, the more extreme elements of the CUP took over in a bloody coup, and the Ottoman Empire was now ruled by 3 main figures. Djemal Pasha (admiral of the navy), Enver Pasha (minister of war), and Talaat Pasha (minister of the interior). They were the very nationalist section of the CUP, and were supporters of Pan-Turkism.

                  When WW1 broke out, the Ottomans chose to side with the Germans, and launched a preemptive strike against the Russian Empire through the Caucasus (remember, Armenia was split between the Ottoman and Russian Empires). The Ottomans believed they were going to be victorious, but their strike was disastrous. Out of the nearly 100,000 soldiers they sent to Russian Armenia, nearly 90% of them were wiped out due to poor preparation and the winter. The CUP blamed the Armenians for their loss, and started deporting all Armenians within their territories to prevent a small number of Armenians from crossing over to the Russian side (indeed some Armenians left the Ottoman Empire to fight for Russia, but you have to remember, in an occupied country, there is ALWAYS going to be SOME people who will fight against their government... Armenians even engaged in anti-Russian activities prior to WW1, but Russians never massacred them). All Armenians in the Ottoman army (tens of thousands of men), were disarmed, and forced into labor camps, where they were either worked to death or outright massacred. With most of the able-bodied Armenian men wiped out, they deported millions of women and children and elderly from east Anatolia to march through the Syrian desert with no supplies. Those that could not keep up with the group were massacred by the Turkish patrols who were "gaurding" them, and the Ottomans even released Kurdish prisoners to prey on the defenseless women and children on the marches. Out of a pre-war population of over 2 million, around 3/4 of them died from 1915-1923 (most of the casualties occured between 1915 and 1917, when Armenians still believed that the Ottomans were moving them for their own safety, since that is what they were told). I should also mention that the Ottomans disarmed the general Armenian population in 1915, and since many Armenians didn't have guns, they had to buy guns from their Turkish and Kurdish neighbors to give to the Ottomans since they would be punished if they didn't hand in anything.
                  Շատ շնորհակալ եմ քու յստակ բացատրութեանդ համար. ես, անշուշտ, գիտէի այս տեղեկութիւններուն բաւարար չափը, բայց իմ գիտութիւնս 2 անգամ աւելի աւելցուցիր: Նորէն կ'ըսեմ, շնորհակալ եմ:

                  Translation: Thank you very much for your clear explanation; I, of course, already knew the sufficient amount of this information, but you increased my knowledge by 2x. I will say it again, thank you!

                  Comment


                  • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

                    Originally posted by skhara View Post
                    Because it helps in the legal precedent of restoring Armenian lands.
                    Ya, but does Turkey have to be such a b**ch about doing the right thing?

                    Comment


                    • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

                      Originally posted by Iranianazeri View Post
                      "Restoring" armenian lands, how do you mean exactly?
                      What he means that the Turks are being stubborn about the recognition of the Genocide, because they know that the recognition would lead to them paying the price...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X