Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too ... See more
See more
See less

When we get East Anatolia back...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

    Originally posted by Iranianazeri View Post
    How do you mean, everyone, or just ottoman fighters?
    I don't know to tell you the truth. I guess individuals would have different reactions. In some places where Armenians raised their level of vigillence, they were on the defensive, their targets could not have been anyone but the enemy fighters. I'm sure you can bet that no quarter was given to any uniformed turk.

    "Restoring" armenian lands, how do you mean exactly?
    Sevres treaty.

    Ya, but does Turkey have to be such a b**ch about doing the right thing?
    "Right thing" is relative. As a matter of fact, from their perspective they did the right thing in WWI. Think about it, if you are a turk wanting the land of the Armenian highland on which there exists a population with a national threat, wouldn't the best way to secure that land and eliminate the threat be eliminating the Armenians.

    The reality, had the Armenian population was fully militant, we wouldn't be talking about the AG today. There never would have been one. Had there not been the AG, there would not be a "turkey" to speak of. Maybe an entity know as Anatolia or something that would hold a group of muslims with an identity crisis.

    Comment


    • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

      Originally posted by skhara View Post
      "Right thing" is relative. As a matter of fact, from their perspective they did the right thing in WWI. Think about it, if you are a turk wanting the land of the Armenian highland on which there exists a population with a national threat, wouldn't the best way to secure that land and eliminate the threat be eliminating the Armenians.
      Well, if an Ottoman Turk thought that killing a civilization of people for land and power is "right", then they are truly heartless and barbarians...

      Originally posted by skhara View Post
      The reality, had the Armenian population was fully militant, we wouldn't be talking about the AG today. There never would have been one. Had there not been the AG, there would not be a "turkey" to speak of. Maybe an entity know as Anatolia or something that would hold a group of muslims with an identity crisis.
      If only that were the truth. I don't care if the Turks had an identity crisis, it would serve them right!

      Comment


      • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

        Originally posted by Էլիա View Post
        Well, if an Ottoman Turk thought that killing a civilization of people for land and power is "right", then they are truly heartless and barbarians...
        Civilization? When turkic tribes showed up in Iran, the Caucasus, Russia, Anatolia, to them the sight of castles and villages was just stuff which got in the way for their herd.

        Comment


        • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

          Originally posted by skhara View Post
          Civilization? When turkic tribes showed up in Iran, the Caucasus, Russia, Anatolia, to them the sight of castles and villages was just stuff which got in the way for their herd.
          Which makes their viewpoint even more barbaric and unethical.

          Comment


          • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

            Originally posted by skhara
            Civilization? When turkic tribes showed up in Iran, the Caucasus, Russia, Anatolia, to them the sight of castles and villages was just stuff which got in the way for their herd
            Thats not true--the Seljuks built plenty of mosques and castles on their domains and had to adapt to their new environment, or else there would be no way a minority of Seljuks could have ruled over such a vast empire.

            The reason they did not have "civilization" as we tend to think of it (cities and all that) is because the central Asian steppe from where they originate is a dry and harsh environment, one in which agriculture cannot be relied on. You had to be a nomad to survive on those lands, and since nomads are always on the move, there is no point in building cities.

            Comment


            • Re: When we get East Anatolia back...

              Originally posted by ArmSurvival View Post
              Thats not true--the Seljuks built plenty of mosques and castles on their domains and had to adapt to their new environment, or else there would be no way a minority of Seljuks could have ruled over such a vast empire.

              The reason they did not have "civilization" as we tend to think of it (cities and all that) is because the central Asian steppe from where they originate is a dry and harsh environment, one in which agriculture cannot be relied on. You had to be a nomad to survive on those lands, and since nomads are always on the move, there is no point in building cities.
              Well, he's not talking about when they were in Central Asia. He's talking about when they came into the Middle East and destroyed everything in their way (I think he is).

              Comment

              Working...