How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

[KanadaHye]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

Nah thats where your wrong. The zionist xians you speak of think just like mr gegev and perhaps like you to. You see they are as racist and they think their religion and race are better then others thus it is ok to do whatever evile in its name. They to will boast of great contributions to society and they to are guilty of horrible acts vs humanity. See a common trend here or are you wearing the chrystian blinders tonight?

Nah, Zionist Xians typically live in America and sound something like this:

[Siggie]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

What gegev was saying is that most Christians are intelligent, useful and productive members of society who make worldly contributions.

No one said that they weren't.

[Haykakan]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

Nah thats where your wrong. The zionist xians you speak of think just like mr gegev and perhaps like you to. You see they are as racist and they think their religion and race are better then others thus it is ok to do whatever evile in its name. They to will boast of great contributions to society and they to are guilty of horrible acts vs humanity. See a common trend here or are you wearing the chrystian blinders tonight?

Thank you for the word soup. I personally prefer madzoun abour. What gegev was saying is that most Christians are intelligent, useful and productive members of society who make worldly contributions.

That, of course, excludes the backwards, Zionist Xians who support and promote war and suffering for the greater good of Israel.

[KanadaHye]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

Everything you said was either a logical fallacy or otherwise does nothing to establish the probative value of the conclusions you wish to advance. Quite the accomplishment.

Thank you for the word soup. I personally prefer madzoun abour. What gegev was saying is that most Christians are intelligent, useful and productive members of society who make worldly contributions.

That, of course, excludes the backwards, Zionist Xians who support and promote war and suffering for the greater good of Israel.

[Siggie]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

“How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?”

As the rest of two milliard Christians; my answer is 100% too .

But the homosexuals, their proponents and some of the rest of sinners, that have democratic right to speak up about their rights/privileges, call the Christian majority backward/illiterate people, because they are not accepted by the religion. There are hundreds of world wide known scientists that are/were Christians, you know.

Alas ... our opponents cannot accept Christian religion as they are advanced/ARAJADEM scientific people and more importantly; because they advocate for things that are considered by the religion as immoral. This is why they are trying to prolong this “discussion” and console themselves that God does not exist, until summoned by...

Please take into consideration the facts above Mos and Pepsi.

Everything you said was either a logical fallacy or otherwise does nothing to establish the probative value of the conclusions you wish to advance. Quite the accomplishment.

[Mos]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

I personally like being Armenian so if promoting "racism" yields a personal identity and conservation of heritage than I guess I'm racist.

I was born male and am not going apologize for my birth gender so if promoting "sexism" yields a personal sense of gender than I guess I'm sexist.

Spot on.

[KanadaHye]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

I havent seen any ultra-liberals in this forum nor does questioning religious teachings make you gay. It is simply about reason and religion is most unreasonable of human practices. Religion was chosen by countries to form or deepen political alliances with other countries yet many people take it seriously with horrible consequences. If you think that the bible is 100% true then you really are backwards because this means you will not use reason and no evidence will sway you. If you wish to glorify irrationality and promote homophobia, racism, sexism,..then yes you are indeed backwards among many other things.

I personally like being Armenian so if promoting "racism" yields a personal identity and conservation of heritage than I guess I'm racist.

I was born male and am not going apologize for my birth gender so if promoting "sexism" yields a personal sense of gender than I guess I'm sexist.

[Haykakan]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

I havent seen any ultra-liberals in this forum nor does questioning religious teachings make you gay. It is simply about reason and religion is most unreasonable of human practices. Religion was chosen by countries to form or deepen political alliances with other countries yet many people take it seriously with horrible consequences. If you think that the bible is 100% true then you really are backwards because this means you will not use reason and no evidence will sway you. If you wish to glorify irrationality and promote homophobia, racism, sexism,..then yes you are indeed backwards among many other things.

[Mos]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

“How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?”

As the rest of two milliard Christians; my answer is 100% too .

But the homosexuals, their proponents and some of the rest of sinners, that have democratic right to speak up about their rights/privileges, call the Christian majority backward/illiterate people, because they are not accepted by the religion.

Therefore they cannot call it advanced/ARAJADEM. This is why they are trying to prolong this “discussion” and console themselves that God does not exist, until summoned by...

Please take into consideration the fact above Mos and Pepsi.

It's a common syndrome from the ultra-liberal values in the West. They demean and ridicule Christians and Christianity - they see faith in Christianity as something backwards. This is a syndrome of the "aggressive secularism" and the "political correctness" of building a globalised, secular society. That's why we need to protect religious values in our society and protect the national faith of the Armenians, like we protect our identity.

[gegev]

Re: How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?

I have a right to my own beliefs, as you do to yours.

“How Much of the Bible Must Be Historical to Believe?”

As the rest of two milliard Christians; my answer is 100% too .

But the homosexuals, their proponents and some of the rest of sinners, that have democratic right to speak up about their rights/privileges, call the Christian majority backward/illiterate people, because they are not accepted by the religion. There are hundreds of world wide known scientists that are/were Christians, you know.

Alas ... our opponents cannot accept Christian religion as they are advanced/ARAJADEM scientific people and more importantly; because they advocate for things that are considered by the religion as immoral. This is why they are trying to prolong this “discussion” and console themselves that God does not exist, until summoned by...

Please take into consideration the facts above Mos and Pepsi.