The Slaying Of U.S. Prisoner

[dusken]

When did I say things were simple? The situations I listed are happening as we speak. It is something to concider. Not to mention the stupid religious clashes in Africa because the muslims tried to impose sharia law causing riots and people killing each other.

And you can't say "things are not that simple" without an explanation.

Simplicity and presence are unrelated.

Yes, I can. You cannot throw out 5 conflicts among 250 nations and use that as a reason to judge the Islamic religion that is followed by a billion individuals. Who is the agressor? What is the conflict? Again, those who mind their business do not make the news.

Concider that! I mean applecider. I mean consider.

[Anonymouse]

Look, people blame me for being a blind believer, or having blind faith, but having blind doubt is no different and both are misleading. However, it benefits the government in every way. It curtails civil liberties at home, it ensures politicians their seats, it means money for corporations who support politicians, such as Halliburton, it creates a reason for expansion and playing empire. Obviously this isn't the first time America has used events which it either had foreknowledge of, or created itself, such as the Spanish American war, in which a vessel was "bombed" by no one knows who, or Pearl Harbor, or the Gulf of Tonkin incident incited by America during Vietnam, or the 91 Gulf War also incited by America. The first suspect is the government.

Read this link. It is long and tedious but it will surely show you Bush' strange behavior on 911.

http://www.cooperativeresearch.net/timeline/main/essayaninterestingday.html

[Anonymouse]

Think about it. WHO BENEFITS? Ask that question. Would Arabs benefit from 911 unless you consider American bombs being a benefit. Would anyone benefit other than the government?

[patlajan]

Simplicity and presence are unrelated.

Yes, I can. You cannot throw out 5 conflicts among 250 nations and use that as a reason to judge the Islamic religion that is followed by a billion individuals. Who is the agressor? What is the conflict? Again, those who mind their business do not make the news.

Concider that! I mean applecider. I mean consider.

The nations listed have nothing in common. And on the other side the conflicts are fought by muslims using terror as a weapon in every case.

[dstyle]

The jews, i believe the musad or whatever theyre called did it.

[dusken]

The nations listed have nothing in common. And on the other side the conflicts are fought by muslims using terror as a weapon in every case.

I fail to see how this is a response to my post. Sorry.

[patlajan]

I fail to see how this is a response to my post. Sorry.

You said the conflicts I listed have nothing in common. I think they do. In each case the muslim opponent's main weapon is terror.

[dusken]

I never said that. Sorry.

[patlajan]

I never said that. Sorry.

Remember saying this?

Yes, I can. You cannot throw out 5 conflicts among 250 nations and use that as a reason to judge the Islamic religion that is followed by a billion individuals.

[dusken]

Remember saying this?

Yes. I do. I went back and read that twice and I still do not understand why you feel I said they had anything in common. Try this...