There's def. a real question here. But you may choose not to see it. Look at racism and prejudice under two different lights.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which Came First,
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by thedebutanteSlavery or Racism?
However, if you are referring specifically to the slavery in North America and US history, that's a different issue. Considering how slaves were predominantly of a specific race and brought from specific parts of the world, I guess it's not hard to see how racism played a big part in shaping the slavery picture in this specific context.Last edited by Sip; 01-11-2005, 07:44 PM.this post = teh win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by !EEKThats not a real issue. Since racisme describes a superior attitude towards another "race"....we know different human races can't exist..so we speak of ethnicity.....
Deb...Why is slavery comming before racisme?Achkerov kute.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thedebutanteDoes anyone have a convincing link to some biological proof on the existence of race?
It is said that if we take a couple of tribes and isolate them from everything else, they would still contain the genetic makeup of the entire human gene pool.
Achkerov kute.
Comment
-
Every time I look at the title of this thread I am tempted to answer that the chicken came first.
Anyway I think racism came first. I am sure even before it was coined 'racism' people who were from different 'caves' () probably disliked eachother and were 'racist', as people tend to be. It seems logical that someone would enslave another person they regard to be inferior to them. Because they regard these people as a whole (and not just one person) as inferior, they are racist. So racism comes before slavery.
The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald
Comment
Comment