Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Evolution discussion from Time magazine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    I can't believe this is still in debate...

    I thought the Darwinian Trials (Monkey Trials whatever) in I believe South Carolina really shed light on the thought processes of the creationists...

    "I ain't from no ape!! Yeeeehhhaaawwww!!"

    That's basically what all this boils down to...creationists in MY THEORY feel superior to every other living organism on the planet thus why it would be inconceivable for them to have evolved from apes.

    "INVCONCEIVABLE!!"

    Really natural selection is a better term to describe what REALLY happens in the evolutionary process. This is that animals/plants and so on with characteristics that were not beneficial to survival DIED leaving behind the long string of survivors that adapted to their environment better than those who went by the way side.

    We should at least all recognize natural selection as an innate truth that surrounds us everyday.

    There is plenty of EVIDENCE supporting evolution which can not be said about the creationists’ theory. I mean there really isn't that much empirical evidence supporting ANYTHING in the Bible. Like Mt. Ararat being the home of Noah’s ark .... right. Or how about where the Arc of the Covenant is located? We don't even know if Jesus was WHITE, yet we go even FURTHER back and try to support claims from the Old Testament ... from the book of Genesis as in the FIRST things ever written for the religion!! LOL

    On the other hand we have DNA evidence, fossils, opposable thumbs, and those fish that they thought were extinct that crawl up onto land with their little feet!

    My girlfriend is an anthropologist with a degree in anthropology (duh!) from University of Michigan. For fear that she might think a good deal of Armenians are not brightest bulbs on the tree I think I'll refrain from telling/showing her this thread.

    While we debate this most fundamental of issues she and I DISCUSS (<- read something ppl on bulletin boards are incapable of actually doing) some of the more intriguing evolutionary topics floating around today such as the Multiple ape theory (I think that's what it's called heheh HEY I'm the music major ) This theory basically poses the idea that we evolved from different apes associated with different regions thus why we have major physical/psychological differences from region to region.

    There are lots of other interesting ideas around these days, but why share them when a good portion of the ppl here are still debating this tired old issue...anyone have a dead horse to beat?

    PS there are scientific "theories" that I bet some of the most adamant creationists here definitely believe in like the plate tectonic theory. Can we definitively prove that it is real? I suppose earthquakes and mountains and fault lines are just silly and pseudoscience LMAO. Religion is the biggest pseudoscience EVER imo!!

    There are also some scientific laws that break down at certain times as well like physics and black holes, however we still use physics to define the physical world around us everyday.

    A lot of ppl look for God and unfortunately all they ever find is religion...

    Boo

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Lamb Boy
      There are lots of other interesting ideas around these days, but why share them when a good portion of the ppl here are still debating this tired old issue...anyone have a dead horse to beat?
      Good post but fortunately, 1. It's not a good portion of the ppl here debating (it's mainly 1 or 2 arguing against evolution) and 2. There isn't really anyone arguing FOR creationism (thank GOD!) as far as I can see. So the main debate as far as I see it here is limited to whether "evolution" is supported by "science" or not.
      this post = teh win.

      Comment


      • #63
        Sip - Evolution as Science - as good science, accepted Science and so on and so forth is pretty clearly established IMO and nothing that anyone has posted here has offered up anything factual to cause one to doubt it - as science and/or as basic truth - as best can be known by man at this time. Fundementally - the counter argument - when examined - is questioning the validity of Science itself - basicaly calling belief/relience on such and on scientific techniques of understanding things - as no better then using myth/religion. Thus - whether or not our local critics of Evolution believe in strict creationsim - its irrelevant - as whatever is believed - and for the most part alternatives have been left unsaid (and wisely so I might add) - whatever is believed - that is counter to the basic doctines and findings that fit within the broad category of the tennents and discoveries of Evolution/Evolutionary Science as known today - is just refusal to believe that Science can actually explain anything about our world and basically is relying on pure personal conjecture - reality is this way because this is what I believe with no tie to any evidence or broad objectivity. Sad and pathetic really...in this day and age...you would think...etc

        Comment


        • #64
          Lamb Boy - Good post (BTW - I too have a degree in Anthropology - just FYI!)

          Originally posted by Lamb Boy
          PS there are scientific "theories" that I bet some of the most adamant creationists here definitely believe in like the plate tectonic theory. Can we definitively prove that it is real? I suppose earthquakes and mountains and fault lines are just silly and pseudoscience LMAO. Religion is the biggest pseudoscience EVER imo!!

          There are also some scientific laws that break down at certain times as well like physics and black holes, however we still use physics to define the physical world around us everyday.
          Yeah - I've never seen a "plate" in the Earth - how silly - looks pretty solid to me...and those big cracks in the ground - well I think rain/erosian caused it - and probably just last weekend - how do I know it was like that for millenia - I didn't observe it - it was in the past....and black holes - I believe in the existance of one when I can touch it for myself! So there!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Sip
            Not even having heard the answers to those questions, I'd go as fas as to say continuing these "discussions" is pointless.
            Agreed. But sometimes it's just fun seeing winoman get flustered and try to copy and paste a bunch of articles and websites.
            Achkerov kute.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Lamb Boy
              I can't believe this is still in debate...

              I thought the Darwinian Trials (Monkey Trials whatever) in I believe South Carolina really shed light on the thought processes of the creationists...

              "I ain't from no ape!! Yeeeehhhaaawwww!!"

              That's basically what all this boils down to...creationists in MY THEORY feel superior to every other living organism on the planet thus why it would be inconceivable for them to have evolved from apes.

              "INVCONCEIVABLE!!"

              Really natural selection is a better term to describe what REALLY happens in the evolutionary process. This is that animals/plants and so on with characteristics that were not beneficial to survival DIED leaving behind the long string of survivors that adapted to their environment better than those who went by the way side.

              We should at least all recognize natural selection as an innate truth that surrounds us everyday.

              There is plenty of EVIDENCE supporting evolution which can not be said about the creationists’ theory. I mean there really isn't that much empirical evidence supporting ANYTHING in the Bible. Like Mt. Ararat being the home of Noah’s ark .... right. Or how about where the Arc of the Covenant is located? We don't even know if Jesus was WHITE, yet we go even FURTHER back and try to support claims from the Old Testament ... from the book of Genesis as in the FIRST things ever written for the religion!! LOL

              On the other hand we have DNA evidence, fossils, opposable thumbs, and those fish that they thought were extinct that crawl up onto land with their little feet!

              My girlfriend is an anthropologist with a degree in anthropology (duh!) from University of Michigan. For fear that she might think a good deal of Armenians are not brightest bulbs on the tree I think I'll refrain from telling/showing her this thread.

              While we debate this most fundamental of issues she and I DISCUSS (<- read something ppl on bulletin boards are incapable of actually doing) some of the more intriguing evolutionary topics floating around today such as the Multiple ape theory (I think that's what it's called heheh HEY I'm the music major ) This theory basically poses the idea that we evolved from different apes associated with different regions thus why we have major physical/psychological differences from region to region.

              There are lots of other interesting ideas around these days, but why share them when a good portion of the ppl here are still debating this tired old issue...anyone have a dead horse to beat?

              PS there are scientific "theories" that I bet some of the most adamant creationists here definitely believe in like the plate tectonic theory. Can we definitively prove that it is real? I suppose earthquakes and mountains and fault lines are just silly and pseudoscience LMAO. Religion is the biggest pseudoscience EVER imo!!

              There are also some scientific laws that break down at certain times as well like physics and black holes, however we still use physics to define the physical world around us everyday.

              A lot of ppl look for God and unfortunately all they ever find is religion...

              Boo

              Apparently you don't understand the pillar of science - the scientific method.
              Achkerov kute.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Anonymouse
                Agreed. But sometimes it's just fun seeing winoman get flustered and try to copy and paste a bunch of articles and websites.
                So you are saying that you enjoy looking the fool? yes...you must...

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Anonymouse
                  Apparently you don't understand the pillar of science - the scientific method.
                  Please explain to me how you came to this conclusion given what I wrote in my post as I am seriously confused by your “rebuttal” if that’s what you call it…

                  What did I mention that even infers the scientific method?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Lamb Boy
                    Please explain to me how you came to this conclusion given what I wrote in my post as I am seriously confused by your “rebuttal” if that’s what you call it…

                    What did I mention that even infers the scientific method?
                    I was simply amused at the lack of scientific candor prevalent in your first post, that you "can't believe", that this discussion still occurs. How dare anyone question anything! Oh the nerve of those pesky inquisitive minds!
                    Achkerov kute.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Sip
                      So the main debate as far as I see it here is limited to whether "evolution" is supported by "science" or not.
                      Precisely, and those such as myself who contend that both creationism, and evolution, are merely beliefs and nothing more.
                      Achkerov kute.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X