If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
See how the two statements coincide with the notion that if you allow men to treat women like property that can be leased, used and traded... then that's exactly what they will do.
No dear... I got that, but how do we go from applying that analogy to highlight compatibility to it must necessarily follow that then women will also be traded, upgraded, and what not? You do realize that it doesn't literally turn women into cars right?
Say what? Then you shouldn't complain when guys test drive used cars and send them back to the dealership because they leak fluid, make whining noises and don't start when you turn the ignition. Or they buy a used car and later decide to upgrade to a newer model because they got bored looking at the older one.
Say what? Then you shouldn't complain when guys test drive used cars and send them back to the dealership because they leak fluid, make whining noises and don't start when you turn the ignition. Or they buy a used car and later decide to upgrade to a newer model because they got bored looking at the older one.
See how the two statements coincide with the notion that if you allow men to treat women like property that can be leased, used and traded... then that's exactly what they will do.
Say what? Then you shouldn't complain when guys test drive used cars and send them back to the dealership because they leak fluid, make whining noises and don't start when you turn the ignition. Or they buy a used car and later decide to upgrade to a newer model because they got bored looking at the older one.
Wow, now you've run out of real criticism and are really reaching... That's part of his point!
The analogy is an apt one because it illustrates that we wouldn't even do that with a car, so why in the world would we do that with a lifelong companion?
Say what? Then you shouldn't complain when guys test drive used cars and send them back to the dealership because they leak fluid, make whining noises and don't start when you turn the ignition. Or they buy a used car and later decide to upgrade to a newer model because they got bored looking at the older one.
second degree, sorry.
Sip's wording is ambiguous enough that one can suggest he himself subscribes to the very analogy being used (thus betraying little consideration for women)
i suggest you do not take these threads too seriously.
Human beings aren't machines or property that is meant to be leased, used and traded.
Wow, now you've run out of real criticism and are really reaching... That's part of his point!
The analogy is an apt one because it illustrates that we wouldn't even do that with a car, so why in the world would we do that with a lifelong companion?
Sexual compatibility is something to consider as well and if we won't even discuss sex, then we're really making a blind commitment.
I completely agree. A lot of the "traditional" views on sex is that hey, you have to go buy a car without getting to test drive it and also without ever having driven anything before in your life and on top of that, you are stuck with that car until the rest of your life
... but the car is "pure" when you do get it.
Human beings aren't machines or property that is meant to be leased, used and traded.
I said it in the other thread, but I'll say it again... This is not only clearly against the rules, but it shows that you've been backed into a corner and now you're just growling and snapping. Rather sad really...
Well it ain't true that levon has been backed into a corner. Sip's translation is inaccurate.
Leave a comment: