Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

[KanadaHye]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

I love this. You copy the definition straight out of the dictionary and declare that definition #4 is wrong and you feel it is something else? This is called changing the rules of the game as playing and I am pretty sure no serious person likes to play this way.

As far as degress of promiscuity, of course there are degrees of promiscuity. A girl having 3 boyfriends in college then marrying one for 64 years is very different than a mother of 3 who sleeps with 5 different men a year over 4 decades while being married.

Maybe you like to be owned by people who think they can make the rules that you play by.

You didn't imply that she slept with any of the boyfriends... typically Americans married their high school "sweethearts". This generation is fu@ked.

[Sip]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

Huh?

reˇlaˇtionˇship

1. The condition or fact of being related; connection or association.
2. Connection by blood or marriage; kinship.
3. A particular type of connection existing between people related to or having dealings with each other: has a close relationship with his siblings.
4. A romantic or sexual involvement. <---- This is an affair, not a "relationship"

I love this. You copy the definition straight out of the dictionary and declare that definition #4 is wrong and you feel it is something else? This is called changing the rules of the game as playing and I am pretty sure no serious person likes to play this way.

As far as degress of promiscuity, of course there are degrees of promiscuity. A girl having 3 boyfriends in college then marrying one for 64 years is very different than a mother of 3 who sleeps with 5 different men a year over 4 decades while being married.

[KanadaHye]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

No, I'm not. I'm saying sex before marriage does not automatically make one promiscuous.

You didn't address my comments about the detriments of your advocated set of social rules at all.

Those weren't my advocated set of social rules. You created them.

[Siggie]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

I'm not sidestepping, you're trying to label women as having "degrees" of promiscuity.

No, I'm not. I'm saying sex before marriage does not automatically make one promiscuous.

You didn't address my comments about the detriments of your advocated set of social rules at all.

[KanadaHye]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

I think you forgot where your sidestepping began. Here you go...

I'm not sidestepping, you're trying to label women as having "degrees" of promiscuity.

[Siggie]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

premarital sex = sex out of marriage
affair = sex out of marriage

symantics?

It's only cheating if YOU DEFINE it as cheating. I see nothing wrong with having an affair with another woman while having a signed contract which the state has defined as your "wife". One is sex inside marriage (a signed contract) while the other is sex out of marriage (no contract).

I think you forgot where your sidestepping began. Here you go...

So a woman who has had sex at all (regardless of pattern of activity or circumstances) is cheap and basically good only as a cheap alternative to a prostitute? No, that's not an extreme view at all.

Let's assume we adjust the definition of loose women to actually apply to promiscuous women (less extreme standard)...
Wouldn't it be better for all to have education about sex and teach responsible practices, etc than to go on this way and have men go to the town wh0re or Russian prostitutes or whatever? Are the men not "dirty" in this scenario? Indiscriminate and reckless? They're going to go expose themselves to disease and then transmit it as a gift to their virgin bride on their wedding night? "Hey, baby... Wait til I show you the skills (and herpes) I picked up practicing with my favorite Russian prostitute " Give me a moment while I swoon at the romance and thoughtfulness.

Alternatively, some guys might recognize this risk, but a society that views premarital sex this way motivates unethical behavior for them too. It makes it a more appealing option to find a girl to "con" as Gegev described: promise to marry her, sleep with her, and then discard her like spent single-use batteries or something. And are these guys going to be honest about this?

And what does it encourage for the girls? Honesty? No... They are motivated to engage in practices that would leave the hymen intact. These are risky behaviors as well; we know anal is riskier and with oral people don't tend to use any protection. Then of course, they would deny any of this.
Then there's the other women who have their hymens surgically recreated... Either way, the outcome is denial and lies. And that works fine for them because all anyone's interested in is a bloody bed sheet.


This kind of behavior is far more morally reprehensible than a woman who has sex inside a committed monogamous long-term relationship.

[KanadaHye]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

Nope, but when someone in a conversation about STDs says "AIDS," I don't start talking about the difference between an aide and an assistant.



Where do you get these insights into the female psyche from?
Women think it's okay to cheat? Is that what you're arguing? What does this have to do with premarital sex again? You evaded the topic so long, I got lost on this zigzaggy nonsensical journey.
Do men find any of those things objectionable?

premarital sex = sex out of marriage
affair = sex out of marriage

symantics?

It's only cheating if YOU DEFINE it as cheating. I see nothing wrong with having an affair with another woman while having a signed contract which the state has defined as your "wife". One is sex inside marriage (a signed contract) while the other is sex out of marriage (no contract).

[Siggie]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

Would you call herpes as aids?

Nope, but when someone in a conversation about STDs says "AIDS," I don't start talking about the difference between an aide and an assistant.

Sex out of marriage - acceptable
Changing partners due to dissatisfaction - acceptable
Seducing other men when not getting attention in a "relationship" - acceptable

Interesting that modern women are shocked with the behaviour of men when they are the ones who condition the behaviour.

Where do you get these insights into the female psyche from?
Women think it's okay to cheat? Is that what you're arguing? What does this have to do with premarital sex again? You evaded the topic so long, I got lost on this zigzaggy nonsensical journey.
Do men find any of those things objectionable?

[KanadaHye]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

That may not be dishonest, but it is unethical. I don't think women on the whole, think this is acceptable in the least.

Sex out of marriage - acceptable
Changing partners due to dissatisfaction - acceptable
Seducing other men when not getting attention in a "relationship" - acceptable

Interesting that modern women are shocked with the behaviour of men when they are the ones who condition the behaviour.

[KanadaHye]

Re: Armenians and sex: what's your opinion?

You want to argue semantics instead of addressing the actual content. Tsk tsk.

Would you call herpes as aids?