Re: Are Armenian women handicapped because of their upbringing?
What gave you that impression? I believe that enough was said to suggest that it can also be observed in other communities, less in some and more in others.
Though interesting, that is a different subject.
First of all the issue that I have raised existed in the past and continues to exist, but to a lesser degree. Keffir was not an usual case, and the problem persists even today.
On the contrary, the issue that you have raised is becoming more acute with time, according to you.
Second of all, the issue that I have raised is less acute in some communities, and more in others i.e. it is community dependent. On the contrary, the issue that you have raised is characterized by the "sameness effect" according to you.
Most of all, the issue that I have raised is gender specific, while the one that you have raised is not. In fact, the may argue that the same can be said about masculinity i.e. virility, honor, integrity are values that have known the same faith as femininity.
I don't intend to discuss the issue that you've raised, and though I can understand and respect the anachronism in your views and values, I can't understand and respect your "despise" of women. I'm also taking in consideration your post about "sl.uts".
By the way, I prefer hrai's description, because it's more articulate, to the point, gender neutral, complete yet concise. Also, it is void of the "despise" that I see in your post.
Why do they like being hostile? How charming.
A handicap is anything that reduces our chances to reach a goal. "Upbringing" is an umbrella word and closest match for a word that I could not find that includes values transmitted by family/community members, values/customs that regulate the behavior of members of a community, restrictions imposed by cultural values/customs etc.
The examples that I've given as a starting point were not limited to relationships with the opposite sex. The example given by Keffir was descriptive enough.
Being silenced, and unlearning to charm can have consequences that can later become handicaps in all kinds of relationships and interactions.
Being silenced and "male favoritism" can cause low self-esteem, as Gavur emphasized.
I will not discuss the details, but I've seen cases where the man was eager to be with an Armenian woman, but ended up with a non-Armenian because of those handicaps, I will mention only two: Once the magic of the "first months" faded away, the men complained that the women were either unwilling or "unable" to charm, as if something was holding them back, or as if they were not even aware that it's part of the game or...By the way, the women did not want to break up and were apparently satisfied with the relationship.
The second handicap is the fact that they are not allowed to freely communicate with the men.
Is that any better?
The same is true of relationships, we can't forgive and start forgetting as long as the wrongdoing is not recognized, and most importantly understood by the other person.
I am so grateful that you're "keeping things simple" for us/me and "keeping them short", that's so thoughtful and kind of you.
I'm sure that you have many more important things to do, and though you're input is so valuable, please feel free to focus on the "more important things".
You may have heard about a recent discovery, it was all over the news about a year ago. It's an incredibly amazing, yet simple technique that allows a person to communicate with others using their lips and no other instruments to transmit words, and others to use their ears and no other instruments to receive the transmitted words. It uses the same principles as radio transmission, who would have guessed? I used that technique to capture the waves transmitted by Armenians who had plans to go Armenia to get married. Isn't it magical?
I sincerely recommend you to try it, specially the listening part.
You wonder how a person can become aware of the intentions of others living in the same community, yet you can figure out the course of history had different scenarios occurred? Don't we all love a not-self-centered, modest Armo?
Originally posted by Anonymouse
Originally posted by Anonymouse
First of all the issue that I have raised existed in the past and continues to exist, but to a lesser degree. Keffir was not an usual case, and the problem persists even today.
On the contrary, the issue that you have raised is becoming more acute with time, according to you.
Second of all, the issue that I have raised is less acute in some communities, and more in others i.e. it is community dependent. On the contrary, the issue that you have raised is characterized by the "sameness effect" according to you.
Most of all, the issue that I have raised is gender specific, while the one that you have raised is not. In fact, the may argue that the same can be said about masculinity i.e. virility, honor, integrity are values that have known the same faith as femininity.
I don't intend to discuss the issue that you've raised, and though I can understand and respect the anachronism in your views and values, I can't understand and respect your "despise" of women. I'm also taking in consideration your post about "sl.uts".
By the way, I prefer hrai's description, because it's more articulate, to the point, gender neutral, complete yet concise. Also, it is void of the "despise" that I see in your post.
Originally posted by bell-the-cat
View Post
Originally posted by bell-the-cat
View Post
The examples that I've given as a starting point were not limited to relationships with the opposite sex. The example given by Keffir was descriptive enough.
Being silenced, and unlearning to charm can have consequences that can later become handicaps in all kinds of relationships and interactions.
Being silenced and "male favoritism" can cause low self-esteem, as Gavur emphasized.
I will not discuss the details, but I've seen cases where the man was eager to be with an Armenian woman, but ended up with a non-Armenian because of those handicaps, I will mention only two: Once the magic of the "first months" faded away, the men complained that the women were either unwilling or "unable" to charm, as if something was holding them back, or as if they were not even aware that it's part of the game or...By the way, the women did not want to break up and were apparently satisfied with the relationship.
The second handicap is the fact that they are not allowed to freely communicate with the men.
Is that any better?
Originally posted by bell-the-cat
View Post
Originally posted by Saco
View Post
I'm sure that you have many more important things to do, and though you're input is so valuable, please feel free to focus on the "more important things".
Originally posted by Saco
View Post
I sincerely recommend you to try it, specially the listening part.
Originally posted by Saco
View Post
Comment