The Policy of Turkification of Iran

[ScythianVizier]

Strangely, the presence of ethnic Turks in Iran, the Kurds in Turkey, Kurds in Syria and Iraq, Azeris in Azerbaijan, Abkhaz in Georgia, Armenians in Karabagh are the issues that the USA is also quite interested in lately.

[imported_oslonor]

Strangely, the presence of ethnic Turks in Iran, the Kurds in Turkey, Kurds in Syria and Iraq, Azeris in Azerbaijan, Abkhaz in Georgia, Armenians in Karabagh are the issues that the USA is also quite interested in lately.

Why do you think is that?

[imported_oslonor]

Something very funny. Azeris were claiming until yesterday that they originate from Medes or Kurds. Today Azeris claim that they are the same as Armenians!!!! And they produce "research" to prove it. Now why Armenians have no memory of suddenly half their population became "Azeris" at some point in the history. And why Azeris do not look like Armenians? Instead of all this nonsense why Azeris do not accept that they are simply Turks and nobody else?

[imported_oslonor]

From another Forum: This is the real Pan-Turkist:

"I would like to thank very much oslonor for sharing with us his filthy Persian rascism. At least he doesn't hide behind the veil of Islam or Shiasm.

My personal opinion is that Azerbaijan should join back to Iran, thats where they belong. They need to be Shiafied from Russian influence. With them joining Iran, Azeris would become the majority group in Iran, and they deserve to rule."

[bell-the-cat]

Strangely, the presence of ethnic Turks in Iran, the Kurds in Turkey, Kurds in Syria and Iraq, Azeris in Azerbaijan, Abkhaz in Georgia, Armenians in Karabagh are the issues that the USA is also quite interested in lately.

My point exactly.
"Oslonor" gets his paycheck from Uncle Sam.

[Gavur]

Azeris want to unite and create united Azerbaijan. But they should not even dream abo

http://www.panarmenian.net/details/eng/?nid=651

[imported_Hellektor]

For the last time

Oslonor, I think I was clear when I said:

OK, oslonor. It's no use arguing with you. You either don't understand what I'm saying or you are a pan-turkist.

You don't need to answer this post. What you do is you twist my words to an extent that I don't even know what you want to make out from what I say.

For the last time these are what I believe and please don't answer (twist) it:

I. A nation called "Azeri" has NEVER existed throughout human history.

II. A country named "Azerbaijan" north of the Arax River NEVER existed before 1918.

III. A language derived from Turkish called "Azeri" does not exist. Turks of the Caucasus speak a DIALECT of Turkish.

IV. The peoples living to the south and to the north of the Arax River have ALWAYS been two separate, unrelated entities throughout history in racial, linguistic, religious, cultural and national terms.

V. The people of the real Azarbaijan (Aturpatekan) SOUTH of the Arax River are Turkish speaking Iranians. This is the result of the Turkic domination in the region.

VI. I deduce from your posts that you support the pan-turkist idea of the existence of two Azarbaijans and the fantasy of "uniting" the two.

I think this is as clear as daylight and does not need any further discussion between you and me.

If you want to argue, go to the other world and argue with all the historians who wrote about the region since the beginning of history recording.

[TurQ]

Now I am getting angry!

When are you grow up Sellektor?

I hope a stone as big as Azerbeyjan falls onto your head and you might come to senses may be!

Oslonor, I think I was clear when I said:


You don't need to answer this post. What you do is you twist my words to an extent that I don't even know what you want to make out from what I say.

For the last time these are what I believe and please don't answer (twist) it:

I. A nation called "Azeri" has NEVER existed throughout human history.

II. A country named "Azerbaijan" north of the Arax River NEVER existed before 1918.

III. A language derived from Turkish called "Azeri" does not exist. Turks of the Caucasus speak a DIALECT of Turkish.

IV. The peoples living to the south and to the north of the Arax River have ALWAYS been two separate, unrelated entities throughout history in racial, linguistic, religious, cultural and national terms.

V. The people of the real Azarbaijan (Aturpatekan) SOUTH of the Arax River are Turkish speaking Iranians. This is the result of the Turkic domination in the region.

VI. I deduce from your posts that you support the pan-turkist idea of the existence of two Azarbaijans and the fantasy of "uniting" the two.

I think this is as clear as daylight and does not need any further discussion between you and me.

If you want to argue, go to the other world and argue with all the historians who wrote about the region since the beginning of history recording.

[imported_oslonor]

My point exactly.
"Oslonor" gets his paycheck from Uncle Sam.

I wish it was true.

[imported_oslonor]

Oslonor, I think I was clear when I said:


You don't need to answer this post. What you do is you twist my words to an extent that I don't even know what you want to make out from what I say.

For the last time these are what I believe and please don't answer (twist) it:

I. A nation called "Azeri" has NEVER existed throughout human history.

II. A country named "Azerbaijan" north of the Arax River NEVER existed before 1918.

III. A language derived from Turkish called "Azeri" does not exist. Turks of the Caucasus speak a DIALECT of Turkish.

IV. The peoples living to the south and to the north of the Arax River have ALWAYS been two separate, unrelated entities throughout history in racial, linguistic, religious, cultural and national terms.

V. The people of the real Azarbaijan (Aturpatekan) SOUTH of the Arax River are Turkish speaking Iranians. This is the result of the Turkic domination in the region.

VI. I deduce from your posts that you support the pan-turkist idea of the existence of two Azarbaijans and the fantasy of "uniting" the two.

I think this is as clear as daylight and does not need any further discussion between you and me.

If you want to argue, go to the other world and argue with all the historians who wrote about the region since the beginning of history recording.

I just make one point. I represent the Persian separatist. What Azeris want to do such as Join others, that is their business. We want to separate from Azeris and Join Afghans who are in the Iranian family. I think that is the best for Persians.