What/who made GOD?

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by Tramanian Glad to know that I'm not alone on this issue.

If you haven't read Ayn Rand's non-fiction you really should, she lays down the most logical basis for Capitalism that I have ever read.

Of course, Politics is only one of five branches of philosophy, and her work with metaphysics, ethics, morals, and epistemology is absolutely suberb. A capitalist should never call himself a capitalist without having studied objectivism.

PM me if you want some recommendations in particular.

If you are referring to Atlas Shrugged, well it's been conquered.

[Anonymouse]

God says:

"Eat red meat".

[Tramanian]

Originally posted by Anonymouse If you are referring to Atlas Shrugged, well it's been conquered.

Actually I'm speaking of her non-fictional work: "Capitalism: the unknown ideal," "The virtue of selfishness," "Introduction to objectivist epistemology," et cetera.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by Tramanian Actually I'm speaking of her non-fictional work: "Capitalism: the unknown ideal," "The virtue of selfishness," "Introduction to objectivist epistemology," et cetera.

Ahh well those have yet to be conquered. By the way, I would highly recommend you read "Human Action" by Ludwig von Mises. Are you familiar with the Austrian school of economics, or the Mises Institute?

https://www.mises.org

[Tramanian]

Originally posted by Anonymouse Ahh well those have yet to be conquered. By the way, I would highly recommend you read "Human Action" by Ludwig von Mises. Are you familiar with the Austrian school of economics, or the Mises Institute?

www.mises.org

Absolutely, Von Mises is/was a brilliant man, although I tend not to enjoy his writing style as much as Rand's.

While Rand does the best job of laying down the philosophical basis for Capitalism, I think Von Mises does the best job of laying down the economic basis for Capitalism.

Another good one is Milton Freidman, or Al Greenspan before he became a God damned fascist.

I'll check out that book, thanks.

[NighT HawK]

hmmmmmm...

Sounds to me like 'the causality paradox'.

Isn't it HUMAN NATURE to assume if something exists
it must BELONG to someone, or something?

If we exist then we must have an owner/creator.... is that it?

Does anyone think of giving a credit to MOTHER NATURE at all ?

Leave a glass of water unattended for a while,
you'll come back only to find some creatures are swimming in it..

The balance of the universe has always been the
Male & Female... There can be no ONE CREATOR !

...and the only two substances that can breed life out of
nothingness are WATER and OXYGEN..

Doesn't that explain why there is no life on the other planets in
our solar system?

It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God, but to create him.

[sSsflamesSs]

NighT HawK, I like you already.

[NighT HawK]

Originally posted by sSsflamesSs NighT HawK, I like you already.

Flames,

I hope it keeps amigo

[Anonymouse]

Yea, them silly humans. I created many Gods myself, mostly while I've been on the toilet, bored out of my mind, trying to think of anything BUT the vein popped in my forehead.

[Shahumyan]

Would you like to explain what human nature is???

The fact is you simply babble out the bourgeoise analysis that is fed to you.

Bourgeoise analysis claims humans are naturally "individual" beings and that we thrive on being individual....would you like to explain why early stonemen worked together and not individually when living and working?

They say we are naturally greedy...but then seem to forget that the whole system of capitalism means you have to be greedy or live at a great disadvantage

They say we simply look out for ourselves, hoow many times do i have to use the example of people risking their lives to save others theyve never met before?

Simple slogans and insults wont get you anywhere....