Originally posted by Siggie
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Religion and Atheism
Collapse
X
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostNo, what I'm doing is showing you the propaganda that the Soviets used to destroy the Orthodox faith. Interesting enough, Russians turned back towards Orthodoxy in 1980 after the fall of the USSR.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by Siggie View PostThat's kind of what you're doing... communists were anti-religion, therefore all non-religious persons must be communists. Yay! What a victory for logic.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostHitler was not Christian and the Nazis worked for the interests of wealthy J3ws. I suggest reading up on the connections between Rockefeller's standard oil and the Nazis.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by Siggie View PostOh yeah... Hitler was a Christian, therefore Christians must also be nazis.
That's kind of what you're doing... communists were anti-religion, therefore all non-religious persons must be communists. Yay! What a victory for logic.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostOh, I can tell just by your thought process (programmed by Soviet J3wish propaganda)
Here is the widespread abortion you advocate article by: Victor Agadjanian
http://business.highbeam.com/6081/ar...views-abortion
Feminism
http://www.realussr.com/ussr/ussr-th...e-of-feminism/
Anti-religion Campaign in the Soviet Union
http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com...propaganda.htm
That's kind of what you're doing... communists were anti-religion, therefore all non-religious persons must be communists. Yay! What a victory for logic.
And you have a terrible read of me. I do not advocate widespread abortion, don't agree with much of the modern (3rd wave i guess?) feminist movement, and I think communism was a terrible idea (I'm a fan of personal responsibility).
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by Siggie View PostI want to ask what exactly you think "everything I want and advocate" are (you know, since you either can read my mind or we've known each other so long, you just know me that well...), but that's not the topic here and I don't particularly want to let you out of defending the claims you made...
Discipline? Fulfillment? Go!
Here is the widespread abortion you advocate article by: Victor Agadjanian
http://business.highbeam.com/6081/ar...views-abortion
Feminism
http://www.realussr.com/ussr/ussr-th...e-of-feminism/
Anti-religion Campaign in the Soviet Union
http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com...propaganda.htm
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostLike I said, you don't want to live in a free America, you want to live in Soviet Russia. Everything you want and advocate is what Soviet Russia was all about.
Discipline? Fulfillment? Go!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by Siggie View PostAh, but you do the same thing. You yourself keep bringing up communists when atheism comes up.
Remember the statement about the logic of this, because I'm going to refer you back to this when you do it yourself. Ahhh... progress... I love it.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Religion and Atheism
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostI missed the part where I said that the non-religious doesn't seek fulfillment. However, if they do seek fulfillment then it seems they are caught in a contradiction and believe that life has a purpose.
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostWell since you live under the brainwashing that is America, you probably denote "religiosity" with belief when in fact there are distinct disciplines associated with every Religion which molds an individual into a useful/active person seeking fulfillment instead of a lazy schmo.
Originally posted by Siggie View PostYou're assuming that the non-religious do not seek any fulfillment. You must establish the veracity of this assumption/premise before you use it to draw your conclusion. Please try again.
So, what? Now you're saying the non-religious and religious both seek fulfillment equally? Because it sounded like you were saying there's a difference between them in degree of discipline initially, then you shifted to fulfillment before you established that there is indeed a difference in discipline.
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostRight, because a few bad apples out of the bunch spoils the whole crate.... typical anti-religion logic.
Remember the statement about the logic of this, because I'm going to refer you back to this when you do it yourself. Ahhh... progress... I love it.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: