Originally posted by KanadaHye
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Armenian lesbians/gays
Collapse
X
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by Sip View PostI don't think I agree here. By the same logic, should we do away with automation? Automation has certainly reduced the need for human labor.
Originally posted by Sip View PostYou forget that women that work also consume. The whole thing just becomes a much larger market. They can own property, invest, and produce as well. You make it sound like women entered the workforce and took chunk out of a static job market where in reality the entire economy just grew and grew. You have clothing and makeup industries that thrive entirely on women for example.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by KanadaHye View PostWell baby doll. This ain't child's play. You know you want more.... bring it.We don't make life easy, that would be boring....
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by yerazhishda View PostIf you point out the negatives of getting a degree, that means you disavow education?I forgot that having a Ph.D. was the Holy Grail...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by yerazhishda View PostI'll get to the rest of your post in a second, but I see it as an exchange of goods. I as a man will go and till the fields, farm work, etc. and bring home food and other necessities, while in return you take care of the welfare of the children and the house while I'm gone.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by Sip View PostOh good I think I may have misunderstood. I thought some of the posts were bashing education and getting degrees like PhD. But as long as that is not what you thnk, then we are in agreement.I forgot that having a Ph.D. was the Holy Grail...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by yerazhishda View PostI'll get to the rest of your post in a second, but I see it as an exchange of goods. I as a man will go and till the fields, farm work, etc. and bring home food and other necessities, while in return you take care of the welfare of the children and the house while I'm gone.When in fact you are giving her a very good and comfortable life, while you work your a*s off trying to support the family.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by Sip View PostIn the old Amish lifestyles ... yah the women stayed home and they ate enough to stay alive and did the house work. But they also didn't spend on anything. They dididn't buy cars and luxuries. They did the slave work which basically meant you were getting a lot of work for "free" by exploiting a large segment of the population. Now that you can't exploit them anymore, it is actually another large job segment: Household cleaning, child care, cooking, shopping etcSo no, I definitely don't agree that the women took jobs from men and reduced the big pie available to men. I would argue they added a lot more pie to the mix.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by Armanen View PostPlease do. In fact, say you are Jooish, it will fit better. They tend to have the crazy libs and feminazis in droves.
In J3wish culture woman is more dominant than the man. They turn the man into scum. What a messed up culture.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenian lesbians/gays
Originally posted by Sip View PostI don't think I agree here. By the same logic, should we do away with automation? Automation has certainly reduced the need for human labor.
You forget that women that work also consume. The whole thing just becomes a much larger market. They can own property, invest, and produce as well. You make it sound like women entered the workforce and took chunk out of a static job market where in reality the entire economy just grew and grew. You have clothing and makeup industries that thrive entirely on women for example.
In the old Amish lifestyles ... yah the women stayed home and they ate enough to stay alive and did the house work. But they also didn't spend on anything. They dididn't buy cars and luxuries. They did the slave work which basically meant you were getting a lot of work for "free" by exploiting a large segment of the population. Now that you can't exploit them anymore, it is actually another large job segment: Household cleaning, child care, cooking, shopping etcSo no, I definitely don't agree that the women took jobs from men and reduced the big pie available to men. I would argue they added a lot more pie to the mix.
You can debate the economic point. However, taking women, who were and still are the primary caregivers out of the home in mass allowed the government to fill that role, one which they have no business doing. Moreover, it increased the tax revenue the government received.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: