Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenian lesbians/gays

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KarotheGreat
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post
    Well I can argue that point because I work with automation. It hasn't reduced the need for human labor, it has just reduced the need for uneducated human labor. It takes a lot of effort to build, program and debug an automated system but you can't take a guy from the assembly line and have him do it. Cave man put part in machine but not know how to make machine go. Although due to the mafia errrr unions, the line worker gets paid more than many educated automation personnel.




    This is true but the women made similar contributions through home economics. Men who earned a single income salary were able feed, clothe, house and support an entire family. The house was in order because there was somebody home to make sure it was in order. Your economic model might be viable if everything wasn't manufactured in China
    And with the two income families we have seen the biggest growth in standard of living ever the fact that today we living in the West have it so good is because of the two income families. That actually dates back to the early industrial revolution or even before the urbanization of the Western Nations. So the one income family has been for such a short period of time in our modern history but for some reason it is still sticking around.

    Leave a comment:


  • KanadaHye
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by Sip View Post
    I don't think I agree here. By the same logic, should we do away with automation? Automation has certainly reduced the need for human labor.
    Well I can argue that point because I work with automation. It hasn't reduced the need for human labor, it has just reduced the need for uneducated human labor. It takes a lot of effort to build, program and debug an automated system but you can't take a guy from the assembly line and have him do it. Cave man put part in machine but not know how to make machine go. Although due to the mafia errrr unions, the line worker gets paid more than many educated automation personnel.


    Originally posted by Sip View Post
    You forget that women that work also consume. The whole thing just becomes a much larger market. They can own property, invest, and produce as well. You make it sound like women entered the workforce and took chunk out of a static job market where in reality the entire economy just grew and grew. You have clothing and makeup industries that thrive entirely on women for example.
    This is true but the women made similar contributions through home economics. Men who earned a single income salary were able feed, clothe, house and support an entire family. The house was in order because there was somebody home to make sure it was in order. Your economic model might be viable if everything wasn't manufactured in China

    Leave a comment:


  • yerazhishda
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post
    Well baby doll. This ain't child's play. You know you want more.... bring it. We don't make life easy, that would be boring....
    Classic!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sip
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by yerazhishda View Post
    If you point out the negatives of getting a degree, that means you disavow education? I forgot that having a Ph.D. was the Holy Grail...
    No no of course not. I think we are in agreement. I thought you were saying pursuing a PhD is a complete waste of time. I think I misunderstood what you were saying. Sure of course there are worthless PhDs and worthless humans that have PhDs but certainly that doesn't mean pursuing a higher education is ever bad. My point is if you are pursuing a PhD in search of some real truth then it is never bad (regardless of what employers might think ... that is irrelevant in the big picture).

    Leave a comment:


  • Sip
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by yerazhishda View Post
    I'll get to the rest of your post in a second, but I see it as an exchange of goods. I as a man will go and till the fields, farm work, etc. and bring home food and other necessities, while in return you take care of the welfare of the children and the house while I'm gone.
    It is all good if it is a fair exchange. As Flamenkita has been saying over and over, she doesn't think such a deal is fair to her and she doesn't want to live that way. The problem is she is being told to STFU and get back in place. THAT is the real problem (that's why I call it slavery). I have no problem otherwise if a woman and a man willingly enter into such an agreement.

    Leave a comment:


  • yerazhishda
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by Sip View Post
    Oh good I think I may have misunderstood. I thought some of the posts were bashing education and getting degrees like PhD. But as long as that is not what you thnk, then we are in agreement.
    If you point out the negatives of getting a degree, that means you disavow education? I forgot that having a Ph.D. was the Holy Grail...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by yerazhishda View Post
    I'll get to the rest of your post in a second, but I see it as an exchange of goods. I as a man will go and till the fields, farm work, etc. and bring home food and other necessities, while in return you take care of the welfare of the children and the house while I'm gone.
    Well some people here will view that as "oppressing" women. When in fact you are giving her a very good and comfortable life, while you work your a*s off trying to support the family.

    Leave a comment:


  • yerazhishda
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by Sip View Post
    In the old Amish lifestyles ... yah the women stayed home and they ate enough to stay alive and did the house work. But they also didn't spend on anything. They dididn't buy cars and luxuries. They did the slave work which basically meant you were getting a lot of work for "free" by exploiting a large segment of the population. Now that you can't exploit them anymore, it is actually another large job segment: Household cleaning, child care, cooking, shopping etc So no, I definitely don't agree that the women took jobs from men and reduced the big pie available to men. I would argue they added a lot more pie to the mix.
    I'll get to the rest of your post in a second, but I see it as an exchange of goods. I as a man will go and till the fields, farm work, etc. and bring home food and other necessities, while in return you take care of the welfare of the children and the house while I'm gone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by Armanen View Post
    Please do. In fact, say you are Jooish, it will fit better. They tend to have the crazy libs and feminazis in droves.


    In J3wish culture woman is more dominant than the man. They turn the man into scum. What a messed up culture.

    Leave a comment:


  • Armanen
    replied
    Re: Armenian lesbians/gays

    Originally posted by Sip View Post
    I don't think I agree here. By the same logic, should we do away with automation? Automation has certainly reduced the need for human labor.

    You forget that women that work also consume. The whole thing just becomes a much larger market. They can own property, invest, and produce as well. You make it sound like women entered the workforce and took chunk out of a static job market where in reality the entire economy just grew and grew. You have clothing and makeup industries that thrive entirely on women for example.

    In the old Amish lifestyles ... yah the women stayed home and they ate enough to stay alive and did the house work. But they also didn't spend on anything. They dididn't buy cars and luxuries. They did the slave work which basically meant you were getting a lot of work for "free" by exploiting a large segment of the population. Now that you can't exploit them anymore, it is actually another large job segment: Household cleaning, child care, cooking, shopping etc So no, I definitely don't agree that the women took jobs from men and reduced the big pie available to men. I would argue they added a lot more pie to the mix.

    You can debate the economic point. However, taking women, who were and still are the primary caregivers out of the home in mass allowed the government to fill that role, one which they have no business doing. Moreover, it increased the tax revenue the government received.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X