Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pistons vs. Lakers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    proves her being a xxxx.
    Definitely. But that doesn't mean Kobe didn't sexually assault her. She could be a wh0re and she could still be s. assaulted. anyhow... that's off-topic.

    i was saying that the thinking behind the idea of it is so irrelevant to the rule, it proves your ignorance of a subject
    well, if the honourable "basketballogist" would like to explain, I would be very happy.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Darorinag
      well, if the honourable "basketballogist" would like to explain, I would be very happy.
      it's a no call most of the time, incidental contact. other times it's dependant on the movemnt of the players involved, if they're coming off of screens and how they were set in regards to position timing and spacing. i think its rule 4- section 27 in federation rules, NBA rule book i think it's still rule 4 i dont know which section.

      Comment


      • #63
        Uhuh, and that definitely was not an intentional thing from either of the players. Yet a foul was called in favour of the Lakers, and it was the Pistons who had the ball before the ref called a foul...

        Comment


        • #64
          The Fakers BARELY beat the Pistons. At Detroit, the Fakers will lose both games.
          Achkerov kute.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Anonymouse
            The Fakers BARELY beat the Pistons. At Detroit, the Fakers will lose both games.
            Both? It's a 2-3-2 system. So the Pistons have 3 successive games on home court. Let's hope they wouldn't give away another game like that.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Darorinag
              Uhuh, and that definitely was not an intentional thing from either of the players. Yet a foul was called in favour of the Lakers, and it was the Pistons who had the ball before the ref called a foul...
              you must have been watching a different game...there were no favorable calls in this game, especially when the lakers were in foul trouble.

              now if there was, i'm sure i can go back to game tape and come up with more calls that should've gone the Lakers way...(ie. the illegal moving back screens, the moving screens set, the grabbing, pushing with the off arm while they were driving...if you look closely, billups carry's the ball a majority of the time, and he pushes off with his off arm to free himself.

              Comment


              • #67
                The only call that wasn't made in favour of the Lakers was that Kobe Bryant missed 3 pointer. Other than that, there was more than 1 call that went in favour of the Lakers when it shouldn't have, especially that foul on Hamilton (I think...), where he also got a technical foul.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Isn't it amazing how the Lakers bring out such passion in people that claim they care nothing about basketball?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by loseyourname
                    Isn't it amazing how the Lakers bring out such passion in people that claim they care nothing about basketball?
                    Well, just to clarify, I don't care about the N***** Basketball Association, that's what I meant. I do like basketball and actually play it quite a lot. I just hate watching NBA games.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Box score for the Los Angeles Lakers vs. Detroit Pistons NBA game from June 8, 2004 on ESPN. Includes all points, rebounds and steals stats.



                      look at the phucking box score you idiots...detroit went to the line more times than LA, and LA got called for more fouls...dont give me that bullshiit about the lakers getting away with fouls

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X