If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Definitely. But that doesn't mean Kobe didn't sexually assault her. She could be a wh0re and she could still be s. assaulted. anyhow... that's off-topic.
i was saying that the thinking behind the idea of it is so irrelevant to the rule, it proves your ignorance of a subject
well, if the honourable "basketballogist" would like to explain, I would be very happy.
well, if the honourable "basketballogist" would like to explain, I would be very happy.
it's a no call most of the time, incidental contact. other times it's dependant on the movemnt of the players involved, if they're coming off of screens and how they were set in regards to position timing and spacing. i think its rule 4- section 27 in federation rules, NBA rule book i think it's still rule 4 i dont know which section.
Uhuh, and that definitely was not an intentional thing from either of the players. Yet a foul was called in favour of the Lakers, and it was the Pistons who had the ball before the ref called a foul...
Uhuh, and that definitely was not an intentional thing from either of the players. Yet a foul was called in favour of the Lakers, and it was the Pistons who had the ball before the ref called a foul...
you must have been watching a different game...there were no favorable calls in this game, especially when the lakers were in foul trouble.
now if there was, i'm sure i can go back to game tape and come up with more calls that should've gone the Lakers way...(ie. the illegal moving back screens, the moving screens set, the grabbing, pushing with the off arm while they were driving...if you look closely, billups carry's the ball a majority of the time, and he pushes off with his off arm to free himself.
The only call that wasn't made in favour of the Lakers was that Kobe Bryant missed 3 pointer. Other than that, there was more than 1 call that went in favour of the Lakers when it shouldn't have, especially that foul on Hamilton (I think...), where he also got a technical foul.
Isn't it amazing how the Lakers bring out such passion in people that claim they care nothing about basketball?
Well, just to clarify, I don't care about the N***** Basketball Association, that's what I meant. I do like basketball and actually play it quite a lot. I just hate watching NBA games.
Box score for the Los Angeles Lakers vs. Detroit Pistons NBA game from June 8, 2004 on ESPN. Includes all points, rebounds and steals stats.
look at the phucking box score you idiots...detroit went to the line more times than LA, and LA got called for more fouls...dont give me that bullshiit about the lakers getting away with fouls
Comment