Originally posted by Kanki
View Post
You said Persia was always weak. But thats fine.
As for the Seljuk age, sure the Persians were politically weak, but they had so much cultural influence over Arabs and Turks by influencing Islamic doctrines and culture.
Originally posted by lampron
You cannot use Ottoman military incompetance of the 16th century to justify the Ottomans' massacre of their own Armenian citizens during WWI.
Originally posted by lampron
Turks arrived on the scene when all the major powers were weakened through centuries of fighting. Most of the nations you named were small ones (Macedonians, Serbs, Albanians) or severely declining (Bulgarians and Byzantines). Its not as difficult to dominate nations when you almost always have numerical superiority through a steady migration of people from the Asian Steppes, and when all your enemies have ancient, bitter feuds and are divided as a result and are in decline. The fact that Turks were Muslims didn't hurt their relations with the entire Middle East and North Africa, either.
I don't see how you can compare Cilicia's situation with that of the Turks. Can you even name some similarities?


Leave a comment: