Originally posted by lampron
View Post
They were a nomad murdering and thieving group. Opportunistic thieves who used murder and torture and fear.
Autojerk policy ? The lowlife scum didn't have a ?policy? If you are talking about their using fear via murder and torture, then there is nothing to learn. If your talking about invading multitudes of countries and commiting murder and torture to take the wealth of the invaded countries, again that's not a ?policy?, but a criminal act committed against --- ALL --- they invaded. Not something to learn or emulate.
If your are talking about the willingness of Europe or anyone else to deal with the murdering thieves and access all the stolen wealth for --- their benifit --- birds of a feather as bothe are conniving for their sole benifit no matter the demise of their nieghbor. Nothing to emulate by either.
Yes, Armenia had faults. But to take that out of context and ignore the continuous assaults Armenia has suffered over the last 3,000 years (at least) is a narrow view at best.
Al Capone was an infamous gangster who murdered freely and become very wealthy. What ? You want to study his policy too ???
The autojerk became wealthy and successful by murder and theft of all the surrounding people's and found willing business partners in the likes of Europe , etc to share in the stolen wealth.
That's a case study for psychiatry, not something to glean an honest viable working model for a nations conduct.

Leave a comment: