Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Sometimes I wonder if someones belling this cat.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Collapse
X
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Originally posted by bell-the-cat View PostNo, it does not. It does play a role in the rhetoric and rabble-rousing indulged in by a few extremists in Turkey and Armenia. And they give amusement.Last edited by Anoush; 05-06-2009, 12:20 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Originally posted by bell-the-cat View PostNo, it does not. It does play a role in the rhetoric and rabble-rousing indulged in by a few extremists in Turkey and Armenia. And they give amusement.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Originally posted by bell-the-cat View PostNobody is that incapable of learning! It's mostly that many people have a vested interest in not admitting the truth, and many more can't start start saying the truth because, for decades, they have been claiming something different is true.
Why is your government Israel so upset about Ahmadinejad when Israelites thought that he denied the Haulocaust? Because they thought then that Ahmadeinejad is being very unfair towards them the J'ews. For many years till now I have been feeling very bad for the J'ews that Hitler mercilessly annihilated so many J'ews. How come and why Israel or Israelites don't feel the same way about Armenians who were barbarically and mercilessly massacred by the turks and today's turkish government denies it vehemently? And Israel supports the turkish government and they deny the Genocide shamelessly.Last edited by Anoush; 05-06-2009, 01:29 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Originally posted by londontsi View Postturkey does, otherwise why so nervous about the whole issueLast edited by Anoush; 05-06-2009, 01:38 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Originally posted by UrMistake View PostThe representatives signed the treaty in Sèvres, France.
The treaty had four signatories, Rıza Tevfik, the grand vizier Damat Ferid Pasha, ambassador Hadi Pasha and the minister of education Reşid Halis who were endorsed by Sultan Mehmed VI. The treaty was not sent to Ottoman Parliament for ratification, as it was abolished on March 18, 1920 by the British, during the occupation of Istanbul. The treaty was never ratified by the Ottoman Empire.
Of the Principal Allied powers it excluded the United States. Russia was also excluded because it had negotiated the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Ottoman Empire in 1918. In that treaty, at the insistence of the Grand Vizier Talat Pasha, the Ottoman Empire regained the lands Russia had captured in the Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878), specifically Ardahan, Kars, and Batumi. Sir George Dixon Grahame signed for Great Britain, Alexandre Millerand for France and Count Lelio Bonin Longare for Italy.
Among the other Allied powers; Greece did not accept the drawn borders and never ratified. Avetis Aharonian, the President of the Delegation of Democratic Republic of Armenia which also signed the Treaty of Batum on June 4, 1918 was the signature of this treaty.
So dont make eny stories,history can't bechanged.
With the great powers making games,Armenia were the last man to be spoken,it were diner with meal the ottoman lands.Intrests are biger than real problems of people till today.
Anyways, now let's all go and let all Armenians around the world to learn if they didn't know it already, to talk about our Legal Sevres Tashnakir-Treaty and let everyone in the world to know as well as the governments!!!!!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
The representatives signed the treaty in Sèvres, France.
The treaty had four signatories, Rıza Tevfik, the grand vizier Damat Ferid Pasha, ambassador Hadi Pasha and the minister of education Reşid Halis who were endorsed by Sultan Mehmed VI. The treaty was not sent to Ottoman Parliament for ratification, as it was abolished on March 18, 1920 by the British, during the occupation of Istanbul. The treaty was never ratified by the Ottoman Empire.
Of the Principal Allied powers it excluded the United States. Russia was also excluded because it had negotiated the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Ottoman Empire in 1918. In that treaty, at the insistence of the Grand Vizier Talat Pasha, the Ottoman Empire regained the lands Russia had captured in the Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878), specifically Ardahan, Kars, and Batumi. Sir George Dixon Grahame signed for Great Britain, Alexandre Millerand for France and Count Lelio Bonin Longare for Italy.
Among the other Allied powers; Greece did not accept the drawn borders and never ratified. Avetis Aharonian, the President of the Delegation of Democratic Republic of Armenia which also signed the Treaty of Batum on June 4, 1918 was the signature of this treaty.
So dont make eny stories,history can't bechanged.
With the great powers making games,Armenia were the last man to be spoken,it were diner with meal the ottoman lands.Intrests are biger than real problems of people till today.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Originally posted by Palavra View PostSo you are waiting for help of USA after France and Russia. You will never learn...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Sevri Tashnakir vs. Karsi Tashnakir
Originally posted by Gavur View Post
The real question needs to be:Does the Sevre agreement play a role in redetermining borders of Armenia and Turkey , if US who is the architect of the Sevre, and a non-signatory party to the Lozan, re-evaluates its long term relations with the Turkish Republic???
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: