Re: Iranian-Armenian relations
Whilst Putin is clearly playing up Russia's Indo-Iranic associations for poltical reasons and Zoroastrianism has Western Asian origins.
What maybe confusing Putin is the Indo-Iranic steppe trans-Urals bronze age cultures, such as the Scytho-Sarmatian. From which people like the Alans and Slavs are in no small part where derived. In ancient times a lot of these weird Scytho Euro-Mongoloid, steppe types where Indo-Europeans and people like the Kazakh where not always Turkic.
Around 60% of Tajiks are R1a1 and seemingly they are related to the Indo-Aryans in Northern India. An Indo-Iranic, homeland in the Urals isn't as far fetched a idea as it might as first seem due to the archeology evidence.
As Afanasevo culture formed the eastern linguistic periphery of the Indo-European continuum of languages whose centre of expansion lay much farther to the west, north of the Black and Caspian seas.
I don't necessarily agree with this guys conclusions. However he does make a few intresting points.
Originally posted by bell-the-cat
View Post
What maybe confusing Putin is the Indo-Iranic steppe trans-Urals bronze age cultures, such as the Scytho-Sarmatian. From which people like the Alans and Slavs are in no small part where derived. In ancient times a lot of these weird Scytho Euro-Mongoloid, steppe types where Indo-Europeans and people like the Kazakh where not always Turkic.
Around 60% of Tajiks are R1a1 and seemingly they are related to the Indo-Aryans in Northern India. An Indo-Iranic, homeland in the Urals isn't as far fetched a idea as it might as first seem due to the archeology evidence.
As Afanasevo culture formed the eastern linguistic periphery of the Indo-European continuum of languages whose centre of expansion lay much farther to the west, north of the Black and Caspian seas.
I don't necessarily agree with this guys conclusions. However he does make a few intresting points.
The Origins of R1a1 Clade and Indo-European
An Out of India theory for the Indo-European languages arose in the 19th Century, but cold water was quickly poured on it, as archeology and linguistics does not support it in the slightest. Recently however, Out of India nuts, most of whom, other than the Indian archeologist Lal, are Indian nationalist and Hindutva ideologues, have focused on genetics.
In particular, they have focused on the R1a1 marker. Recent studies, in particular this paper, have suggested an Indian origin for R1a1. It is true that R1a1 is a marker for Indo-European. However, the time depth for the origin of R1a1 is about 18,000 years. It originated in an area bounded by southern Siberia near Omsk in the north and southern Pakistan in the south. This area includes Pakistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Southern Russia. It may also include northern India.
The linked paper states that R1a1 arose in the Central Asian steppes and South Asia 18,000 YBP. That is far earlier than the earliest time depth for Indo-European, which is ~8,000 years old and has its homeland probably in Anatolia, certainly not in India.
R1a1 arose in the Central-South Asian region long ago. At some point, some of them moved out to the region of Southern Russia where the Kurgan Culture took hold. There was probably a back movement of these folks south to Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Stans and India in the form of Indo-Aryan speakers about 3,500 years ago.
The homeland of the Indo-Aryan speakers is in far northwest Kazakhstan and neighboring regions of Russia near the far southeast end of the Urals and is dated to 4,500-5,000 YBP.
It is probably from this region that the R1a1 found in the Slavic regions originated.
The new genetic evidence is completely in accord for southern Russian homeland for IE and adds no weight whatsoever to the Out of India theory, since the clade originated far before I-E even existed in the pre-IE era.
References
Mirabal et al. 2009. “Y-Chromosome distribution within the geolinguistic landscape of northwestern Russia”, European Journal of Human Genetics 17: 1260–1273
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2...indo-european/
An Out of India theory for the Indo-European languages arose in the 19th Century, but cold water was quickly poured on it, as archeology and linguistics does not support it in the slightest. Recently however, Out of India nuts, most of whom, other than the Indian archeologist Lal, are Indian nationalist and Hindutva ideologues, have focused on genetics.
In particular, they have focused on the R1a1 marker. Recent studies, in particular this paper, have suggested an Indian origin for R1a1. It is true that R1a1 is a marker for Indo-European. However, the time depth for the origin of R1a1 is about 18,000 years. It originated in an area bounded by southern Siberia near Omsk in the north and southern Pakistan in the south. This area includes Pakistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Southern Russia. It may also include northern India.
The linked paper states that R1a1 arose in the Central Asian steppes and South Asia 18,000 YBP. That is far earlier than the earliest time depth for Indo-European, which is ~8,000 years old and has its homeland probably in Anatolia, certainly not in India.
R1a1 arose in the Central-South Asian region long ago. At some point, some of them moved out to the region of Southern Russia where the Kurgan Culture took hold. There was probably a back movement of these folks south to Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Stans and India in the form of Indo-Aryan speakers about 3,500 years ago.
The homeland of the Indo-Aryan speakers is in far northwest Kazakhstan and neighboring regions of Russia near the far southeast end of the Urals and is dated to 4,500-5,000 YBP.
It is probably from this region that the R1a1 found in the Slavic regions originated.
The new genetic evidence is completely in accord for southern Russian homeland for IE and adds no weight whatsoever to the Out of India theory, since the clade originated far before I-E even existed in the pre-IE era.
References
Mirabal et al. 2009. “Y-Chromosome distribution within the geolinguistic landscape of northwestern Russia”, European Journal of Human Genetics 17: 1260–1273
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2...indo-european/
Comment