Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Iranian-Armenian relations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Surenas
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    Oh please. Much bigger Israeli and American threat than any Iranian threat. The West has hypocritically made Iran into this big bad demon.
    It's just all a matter of a geo-political game. A game between the US, Israel, Turkey and the Gulf Arabs against Iran + their Shia (some Sunni also) proxies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Surenas View Post
    Did you miss al the news and fuss about the 'Iranian threat' the last years?
    Oh please. Much bigger Israeli and American threat than any Iranian threat. The West has hypocritically made Iran into this big bad demon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Surenas
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    Lol, and what is "Iranian threat" ?
    Did you miss al the news and fuss about the 'Iranian threat' the last years?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Surenas View Post
    Yes, but a different kind of ally than Asim Mollazade wants to picture. He just want to label Armenia as a supporter of the 'Iranian threat'.
    Lol, and what is "Iranian threat" ? He's an Azeri politician, let's not take his statements regarding Armenia too seriously.

    Leave a comment:


  • Surenas
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    In many respects we are an ally of Iran. Maybe not military ally like we are with Russia, but ally in many other spheres. We support each other in international settings and Iran has always been favourable towards Armenians.
    Yes, but a different kind of ally than Asim Mollazade wants to picture. He just want to label Armenia as a supporter of the 'Iranian threat'.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Surenas View Post
    Aha, never knew that this website has a bad reputation here. I saw the article on this forum and thought it would be interesting to put it here.



    The man talks nonsense of course. Describing Armenia as an ally of Iran is quite misleading.
    In many respects we are an ally of Iran. Maybe not military ally like we are with Russia, but ally in many other spheres. We support each other in international settings and Iran has always been favourable towards Armenians.

    Leave a comment:


  • Surenas
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    Surenas, don't quote "historyoftruth" articles here. Most of the things there are just Turkish BS. They will use phrases such as "outpost of Iran" to get clueless Western politicians on their side. If you noticed: "Asim Mollazade, member of the working group on interparliamentary ties Azerbaijan-US, Milli Majlis deputy". His agenda is clear - to get as much US favouritism as he can get. Of course, we do have warm relations with Iran, and that is very good for our national interests, but we are certainly not an "outpost".
    Aha, never knew that this website has a bad reputation here. I saw the article on this forum and thought it would be interesting to put it here.



    The man talks nonsense of course. Describing Armenia as an outpost of Iran is quite misleading.
    Last edited by Surenas; 06-18-2012, 06:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Surenas, don't quote "historyoftruth" articles here. Most of the things there are just Turkish BS. They will use phrases such as "outpost of Iran" to get clueless Western politicians on their side. If you noticed: "Asim Mollazade, member of the working group on interparliamentary ties Azerbaijan-US, Milli Majlis deputy". His agenda is clear - to get as much US favouritism as he can get. Of course, we do have warm relations with Iran, and that is very good for our national interests, but we are certainly not an "outpost".

    Leave a comment:


  • Surenas
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    'Armenia Turns Into Iranian Outpost'

    Interview with Asim Mollazade, member of the working group on interparliamentary ties Azerbaijan-US, Milli Majlis deputy.

    Q: Can the new US approach to the resolution of the Karabakh conflict, declared by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her visit to the South Caucasus region change the established status quo in the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia?

    A: Armenia is the main reason of the absence of any achievements in Karabakh settlement. This country recently stopped even imitating its participation in the peace process. Armenia’s position is the continued occupation of the Azerbaijani lands and preservation of the conflict. In its policy, Armenia relies on the forces that back it. Therefore, Armenia’s main policy is destabilization of the situation in the South Caucasus region and continuation of an aggressive policy. However, it is regretful that the Minsk Group co-chairs just limit to usual ‘common’ statements.

    Today the Azerbaijani side faced an unprecedented fact when a part of the country was occupied by a neighbor state which recently refused to take any part in the negotiation process. This situation has been lasting for over 20 years and the resolutions adopted by the UN Security Council, European parliament, Council of Europe and other international organizations, urging to ensure the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and end Armenia’s occupational policy remain unfulfilled.

    Q: Does the United States have real leverages of influencing Baku and Yerevan to attain compromise in the resolution of the Karabakh conflict?

    A: I consider that Azerbaijan has made a sufficient compromise. Azerbaijan adopted all proposals of the OSCE Minsk Group. However, there are no responsive steps that are the compromises of the Armenian side. Therefore, the stiff, uncompromised position of Armenia is the main obstacle to progress in peace process. This country is the main obstacle for Euroatlantic integration of Azerbaijan and Georgia. Armenia has turned itself into the military outpost and the main ally of Iran in the region.

    Q: During her stay in Armenia, Clinton said that three principles of international law, in particular, provision of the territorial integrity of the state, provision of the right of nations for self-determination and nonuse of force must be applied to the resolution of the Karabakh conflict. Are these principles not contrary to the resolution of the Karabakh conflict?

    A: None of these principles go contrary to the position of Azerbaijan in the resolution of the Karabakh conflict. Provision of territorial integrity is the most important principle for Armenia in the resolution of the Karabakh conflict. All the same, Azerbaijan accepts the need to ensure the right of nations for self-determination since this international principle does not mean creation of a separate state, especially that the Armenian people have already self-determined within Armenia. Therefore, Azerbaijan is able to ensure autonomy and self-government to Armenians living in Nagorno Karabakh, that is in Azerbaijan.

    In addition to this, Azerbaijan also agreed to ensure them with international guarantees of security. Azerbaijan has already taken huge steps to solve the Karabakh conflict and achievement of peace. Azerbaijan is sincerely interested in peace since the country has a great number of tasks and programs. Azerbaijan needs peace in the region from strategic standpoint.

    Q: During the visit to the South Caucasus Clinton again stated the need to normalize ties between Turkey and Armenia. Can the US pressure on the issue of the Turkish-Armenian normalization accelerate or hinder the resolution of the Karabakh conflict?

    A: Azerbaijan is not against normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia. However, the reason hampering the normalization is the continued occupation of Azerbaijani lands by Armenia. I think that the whole world has understood that the Zurich protocols which did not include the resolution of the Karabakh conflict were senseless.

    Q: To what extent is the United States interested in the resolution of the Karabakh conflict?

    A: I have no doubts that the United States is interested in the resolution of the Karabakh conflict. All the same, every US steps, especially in the years of elections in this country, are held with caution to a very rich and politically active Armenian diaspora. Azerbaijan would like the United States to do everything possible for the liberation of lands. I am sure that peace in the South Caucasus is necessary not only to Azerbaijan but also its allies including the United States.

    Leave a comment:


  • arakeretzig
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    loser syndrome is often chronic.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X