Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Iranian-Armenian relations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    The one thing that will definitely continue to happen with peacekeepers around is sniper fire. It happens on the Israeli-Lebanon border all the time. Azerbaijan will never agree to withdraw snipers.
    Well if Azerbaijan doesn't withdraw snipers than there's no point to this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Federate
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    The only way they could be useful is that Azeris would have to think twice before attacking as there would be established 3rd party witnesses to their aggression. It would also remove snipers, and thus end all the sniper deaths. So as you see, mostly indirect benefits, as directly they are more or less useless.
    The one thing that will definitely continue to happen with peacekeepers around is sniper fire. It happens on the Israeli-Lebanon border all the time. Azerbaijan will never agree to withdraw snipers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Federate
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    Most likely I would think it would be EU/OSCE sending peacekeepers. I am all for anything that may diffuse the tension at the border and be a deterrent to an Azeri attack.
    We are our own deterrents. Nothing strikes fear into the enemy more than a confident local population bent on defending its borders and survival. Foreign peacekeepers will probably not serve as deterrents if they follow the Rwanda or Lebanon model, they will be there to make sure we enforce any agreement and then sit by idly if a war breaks out, even if they come under attack. Ban Ki Moon will probably go on TV and say we should stop fighting, words nobody will care about. A NATO/Western peacekeeping operation (the worst thing that can happen) would never be accepted by Russia anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by KarotheGreat View Post
    Africa has shown what Western peace keepers can do, nothing. It's better not to have a single soldier guarding the border then having Western peace keepers there.
    The only way they could be useful is that Azeris would have to think twice before attacking as there would be established 3rd party witnesses to their aggression. It would also remove snipers, and thus end all the sniper deaths. So as you see, mostly indirect benefits, as directly they are more or less useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • KarotheGreat
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Mos View Post
    Most likely I would think it would be EU/OSCE sending peacekeepers. I am all for anything that may diffuse the tension at the border and be a deterrent to an Azeri attack.
    Africa has shown what Western peace keepers can do, nothing. It's better not to have a single soldier guarding the border then having Western peace keepers there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    I oppose Western peacekeepers in Artsakh too. You know your country is fuked anytime the UN deploys peacekeepers. We can do that ourselves. At best, maybe Russian ones.
    Most likely I would think it would be EU/OSCE sending peacekeepers. I am all for anything that may diffuse the tension at the border and be a deterrent to an Azeri attack.

    Leave a comment:


  • Federate
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    I oppose Western peacekeepers in Artsakh too. You know your country is fuked anytime the UN deploys peacekeepers. We can do that ourselves. At best, maybe Russian ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mos
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    I suspect it's an Iranian domestic issue and he's not risking leaving the country. Unconfirmed reports on Twitter that Ahmadinejad announced a major press conference tomorrow right after cancelling the Armenia trip. Khamenei has been up his throat ever since the firing of some minister that was reinstated by Khamenei. There's some issues with the oil minister now and there's rumours that range from Ahmadinejad's resignation to announcement of new elections soon.
    Yeah, not the best time for Ahmadinejad to be visiting, given the political situation in his country. We don't want to be talking with a man who may not be leader for very long. Another thing to watch out for is Iran's opposition to the international (Western) peacekeepers that may be deployed to the Karabakh region. This is something that we want, as it will prevent Azerbaijan from attacking or sniping readily, but Iranians are very much against it because they see it as a Western encroachment on their border.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tigranakert
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    Originally posted by Federate View Post
    I suspect it's an Iranian domestic issue and he's not risking leaving the country. Unconfirmed reports on Twitter that Ahmadinejad announced a major press conference tomorrow right after cancelling the Armenia trip. Khamenei has been up his throat ever since the firing of some minister that was reinstated by Khamenei. There's some issues with the oil minister now and there's rumours that range from Ahmadinejad's resignation to announcement of new elections soon.
    Indeed, there have been major domestic things going on in Iran these couple of weeks...

    Iran sends submarines to Red Sea -Fars news agency
    Tue Jun 7, 2011 8:02am GMT Print | Single Page [-] Text [+]

    TEHRAN, June 7 (Reuters) - Iran has sent submarines to the Red Sea, the semi-official Fars news agency reported on Tuesday, citing an unidentified source, in a move that could anger Israel.

    "Iranian military submarines entered the Red Sea waters with the goal of collecting information and identifying other countries' combat vessels," Fars said.

    It did not specify the number or type of vessels involved but said they were sailing alongside warships of the Navy's 14th fleet.

    State-run Press TV said in May the 14th fleet, comprised of two vessels, the Bandar Abbas warship and Shahid Naqdi destroyer, had been sent to combat piracy in the Gulf of Aden.

    "The fleet entered the Gulf of Aden region in May and has now entered the Red Sea in the continuation of its mission," Fars said.

    Two Iranian warships passed through the Suez Canal in February, the first such move since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, en route to Syria. Tehran said the mission was one of "peace and friendship" but Israel called it a "provocation".

    Iran announced last August it had expanded its fleet of domestically built 120-tonne Ghadir-class submarines to 11 which it said would be used to patrol the Gulf and the Sea of Oman.

    It has deployed warships further afield, as far as the Red Sea, to combat Somali pirates but has not previously said it sent submarines to those waters. (Reporting by Hashem Kalantari; Writing by Robin Pomeroy; editing by Elizabeth Piper)

    Leave a comment:


  • Federate
    replied
    Re: Iranian-Armenian relations

    I suspect it's an Iranian domestic issue and he's not risking leaving the country. Unconfirmed reports on Twitter that Ahmadinejad announced a major press conference tomorrow right after cancelling the Armenia trip. Khamenei has been up his throat ever since the firing of some minister that was reinstated by Khamenei. There's some issues with the oil minister now and there's rumours that range from Ahmadinejad's resignation to announcement of new elections soon.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X