Originally posted by Gavur
View Post
Originally posted by Gavur
View Post
Originally posted by hipeter924
View Post
By the way, I said handicapped, not sexually exploited as the trafficked girls or terrorized as in Afghanistan, Pakistan or...
Originally posted by Kiffer
View Post
Sadly enough, some do not see the obvious i.e. being "old minded" or being perceived as such, can contribute to being what Saco calls "dead minded" instead of preventing it, as he believes.
Originally posted by Lucin
View Post
Originally posted by Lucin
View Post
Originally posted by Lucin
View Post
"In societies where Armenians are directly exposed to other cultures, the traditional concept of the Armenian couple becomes vulnerable because insufficient to guarantee the longevity of the couple. I don't shy away from responsibilities, but a sense of responsibilities is not always enough to guarantee the longevity of a relationship, partners should not take each other for granted and that's where charm comes in. I don't have in mind particular charms, and it's more about charming."
I would simply add that through the internet Armenians in Armenia are also exposed to other cultures, but to a much lesser degree.
Originally posted by Lucin
View Post
I can't clearly define charm for the same reasons than one can't clearly define love or anything so essential to human life, both are multifaceted and maybe too "natural/primitive" to be fully understood. But I'll do my best.
First of all, I will remind what I've already said: "I don't have in mind particular charms, and it's more about charming." That is to say that what matters is the natural inclination that we have to charm, how it's done is to some degree culturally dependent.
In cooking, the ingredients do not make the dish, the cook does. The same applies to charming. The ingredients can be as simple as a smile, an earring, the passion in our words, the way one tilts the head, kindness, intelligence, the expression of the eyes, the stories one invents, our integrity, our love, giving, our dreams etc. etc.
For a far fetched but relevant example, imagine feeling on your palate grains of sugar that were not properly melted, when eating chocolate. The sugar is meant to create a pleasant sensation, instead it causes a slightly unpleasant one.
The same is also true of fashion, the clothes do not make the style, the person does.
Second of all, I would distinguish it from what can be considered as a responsibility or compliance to a certain code/etiquette. For instance, little girls want to put on pretty dresses because they want to be a princess and charm, older women put on pretty dresses because it is proper. The dream is gone.
Another example is when Armenians put a pretty dress because it's "shnorkov", the purpose is not to charm but to comply. Of course, the two are not mutually exclusive.
Third of all, I would distinguish it from acting i.e. forcing oneself to do what people consider as charming, so it has to be naturally part of you. I have in mind women who force themselves to act in certain way just or wear a certain type of clothes/underwear just because they believe that their partner would enjoy it. Of course, if the woman genuinely enjoys how the clothes/underwear feel/look on her body then it's not acting, and she will wear them differently, with style.
Of course, reality is not as clear cut, pure black and white are ideas and life is made of shades of gray. In other words, there may be some dream left when something done as a responsibility, something genuine when a woman puts up an act or...
Is that a good start?
Originally posted by Lucin
View Post

I mean seriously, what has it got to do with the government?? 
....
Leave a comment: