TurQ Iraq is a socalled "nation" created by the British after world war 1. There has never been a country called Iraq before WW1.
The creation of Iraq meant there was no Kurdish state created and it also meant that large territory was under British mandate. Iraq should be split into a Kurdistan in the north and a Arab territory in the south. The Turkomen can live in Kurdistan and have better rights than Kurds have living in Turkey currently have (as is the case). Is there anything wrong with Syria, Turkey, Iran and Iraq give up land for the formation of a Kurdish nation?
The socalled Turks in Bulgaria are mainly Muslim Bulgarians. As is the same for the Turks in Greece - they are just Muslim Greeks.
Are you sure Erdogan is just frightened of a Kurdish nation in Iraq because as natural progression dictates it will undoubtably lead to a northern Kurdistan being established from land currently owned by the Turkish republic (which they neglect and land that has hardly any Turks in at all)
The creation of Iraq meant there was no Kurdish state created and it also meant that large territory was under British mandate. Iraq should be split into a Kurdistan in the north and a Arab territory in the south. The Turkomen can live in Kurdistan and have better rights than Kurds have living in Turkey currently have (as is the case). Is there anything wrong with Syria, Turkey, Iran and Iraq give up land for the formation of a Kurdish nation?
The socalled Turks in Bulgaria are mainly Muslim Bulgarians. As is the same for the Turks in Greece - they are just Muslim Greeks.
Are you sure Erdogan is just frightened of a Kurdish nation in Iraq because as natural progression dictates it will undoubtably lead to a northern Kurdistan being established from land currently owned by the Turkish republic (which they neglect and land that has hardly any Turks in at all)
Comment