Tweet
Re: War in The Middle East
What you have done is drawn arbitrary boundaries as to what is or is not an acceptable comparison.
The reality is that being otaramol has nothing to do with Armenian ethnocentricism that is very much alive and thank God it is, within many Armenians. The two exist exlusively, and if it had not been for those xenophobes and ethnocentrics we would not be alive and be nothing but diluted Turks and tunots. That isn't the point. Turks are non-Armenians and many Armenians have deep hatred towards Turks and with good reason. The truth is everyone has deep hate towards someone or other, at some point or other, with different degrees. And why is the example of skinheads in Russia attacking Armenians not a good example to bring in? Why is it that Armenians are being targeted? You ascribe the reasons as to why Joos have historically been targeted as things they have done, as nothing is without a reason, yet if we apply the similar logic, why do you think Armenians in Russia are being targeted? You think it is without reason and that Armenians were being angels and all of a sudden were attacked? Could it be that they engaged in certain things, or who knows what, that displeased the locals?
And believe me, I know all that you know about Israel, Khazars, Israel Shahak, Benjamin Freedman, the Holocaust or past U.S. Presidents who have been Joos, or the Doenmeh Loos that made the Young Turk movement possible, or the famous Rabbi ben Yohai I believe who stated that a million Arabs are not worth a Jooish fingernail, etc. It means nothing. All we have done is lay here and expose Joos on a one way street. Now I don't know if you like a one way discussion of nothing more than exposing Joos and Israel, and I don't know if I am playing devil's advocate or not, but I believe it is essential to include context.
When I pointed out that Islam is a similar religion like Judaism in terms of its self-centered nature and egoism and arrogance, you justified that by claiming that historically Arabs have been good to Armenians, and our problem has been a Turkic one. While this is accurate for most of history but it ignores history prior. Do you forget that even before the Turks that Arabs conquered and ruled Armenia under Islam and Armenians were second class and that many a beautiful Armenian woman became wives to these sultans? The point is, Islam is no different than Judaism, yet you have argued that Judaism is evil and promotes hatred of non-Joos, yet praised Arabs and Hezbollah, when these are the precise organizations that preach similar things. Now I am no dope and I do believe that almost all of Hezbollah and Hamas is a reaction to American and Israeli aggression, but beyond that, independently and of themselves, if these Islamic groups achieve power, they will impose it on everyone including you for being a heathen.
Originally posted by Armenian
What you have done is drawn arbitrary boundaries as to what is or is not an acceptable comparison.
The reality is that being otaramol has nothing to do with Armenian ethnocentricism that is very much alive and thank God it is, within many Armenians. The two exist exlusively, and if it had not been for those xenophobes and ethnocentrics we would not be alive and be nothing but diluted Turks and tunots. That isn't the point. Turks are non-Armenians and many Armenians have deep hatred towards Turks and with good reason. The truth is everyone has deep hate towards someone or other, at some point or other, with different degrees. And why is the example of skinheads in Russia attacking Armenians not a good example to bring in? Why is it that Armenians are being targeted? You ascribe the reasons as to why Joos have historically been targeted as things they have done, as nothing is without a reason, yet if we apply the similar logic, why do you think Armenians in Russia are being targeted? You think it is without reason and that Armenians were being angels and all of a sudden were attacked? Could it be that they engaged in certain things, or who knows what, that displeased the locals?
And believe me, I know all that you know about Israel, Khazars, Israel Shahak, Benjamin Freedman, the Holocaust or past U.S. Presidents who have been Joos, or the Doenmeh Loos that made the Young Turk movement possible, or the famous Rabbi ben Yohai I believe who stated that a million Arabs are not worth a Jooish fingernail, etc. It means nothing. All we have done is lay here and expose Joos on a one way street. Now I don't know if you like a one way discussion of nothing more than exposing Joos and Israel, and I don't know if I am playing devil's advocate or not, but I believe it is essential to include context.
When I pointed out that Islam is a similar religion like Judaism in terms of its self-centered nature and egoism and arrogance, you justified that by claiming that historically Arabs have been good to Armenians, and our problem has been a Turkic one. While this is accurate for most of history but it ignores history prior. Do you forget that even before the Turks that Arabs conquered and ruled Armenia under Islam and Armenians were second class and that many a beautiful Armenian woman became wives to these sultans? The point is, Islam is no different than Judaism, yet you have argued that Judaism is evil and promotes hatred of non-Joos, yet praised Arabs and Hezbollah, when these are the precise organizations that preach similar things. Now I am no dope and I do believe that almost all of Hezbollah and Hamas is a reaction to American and Israeli aggression, but beyond that, independently and of themselves, if these Islamic groups achieve power, they will impose it on everyone including you for being a heathen.
Comment