Anyway, thanks to a few confused individuals, the whole thread suffered a setback, from what I actually wanted to chat about. Instead we focused on trivial Clintonian double-speak such as what does "sex" really mean?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Virgin or Experienced?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by AnonymouseDid you know, that according to Dan, there is no real definition of anything, because words actually mean something other than what they mean? So your friend was not a virgin.
Comment
-
Originally posted by angelik22isnt the world just an illusion dan? are we really here on earth? how do i know youre not some computer programmed device that responds to every thread?
sorry if im picking on u, im just havin some fun danny boy- missed yah
Comment
-
Originally posted by DarorinagAmen, amen, amen.
Here's a typical conversation between a couple of anti-relativists who insist that there is a clear-cut definition of losing virginity:
Person A: Virginity is not relative. It means "sexual intercourse."
Person B: Yeah, virginity is not relative. No, it doesn't mean "sexual intercourse", it means "insertion of penis into the vagina", which implies that gay men are technically virgins.
Person A: No no, losing virginity is about having sex. Period.
Person C: Hey guys, I agree that the definition of losing virginity is not relative, but it means that a guy who's having sex with a girl for the first time reaches climax.
Observer: So how do you all know that the term is not relative, and that losing virginity is in case of Person A: sexual intercourse, in case of Person B: insertion of penis into vagina, in case of Person C: a guy reaching climax?
Persons A, B, C: Oh, we *know*!
So much about anti-relativism.Achkerov kute.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EmilLast warning or I'll bust out my thread closed picture.
Comment
Comment