Armenia for Armenians

[Mos]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

Can you please quote the law book or any other source. Because I know your talking out of your ass.

As citizens of Armenia, Diasporan Armenians will gain the right to vote, the right to buy and own land, enjoy legal protections of private property laws,

Property laws in Armenia
A friend's parent was in Armenia back in Fall, and he wanted to buy a piece of land in Broshian city.
Broshian is 12 Km from core, downtown Yerevan. He left and Nigol purchased it for them.
A couple of months later we met in Toronto, they wanted to buy, Nigol was ready to sell. Then they called the Armenian embassy.
Someone, (consul?) told them that as they were not Armenian citizens they could not buy/own land in Armenia.
Hello, we're not Armenian citizens and we own land in Armenia. Would our friends believe us?

My uncle is not talking out of his ass, he knows the property laws very well, better than anybody on this forum.

Do you know how retarded you sound? Time after time you prove that you know nothing, every time you open your mouth only BS comes out of it. You try to sound high and mighty with relatives that are close to the ruling bodies and say that you'll soon join them and one post there after you say that you hate them. You're nothing more than troll
so stop the trolling.

And tell me how migration laws are retarded? Every country has them. Either say something substantial or stop with the personal attacks, it's really immature.

Apparently in this forum, if you aren't an axpar dashnak, you are the enemy of the armenian people. If you disagree with dashnak politics all of a sudden you're equivalent to a Turk. It's really getting ridiculous.

[londontsi]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

But to me what is sad is how the supposed intellectuals on this board always let the likes of mos get away unapposed with posting dangerous and obnoxious opinions in public. They are the same people who, on a wider stage, just silently hunker down in their bunkers whenever any difficult issue arises.

I have never been classed or posed as an intellectual.

However I must admit I find debating with idiots extremely difficult.
I guess most posters here would have similar shortcoming.

That is why the very few posters of Mos-es calibre seem to have a free hand.

[Mos]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

I have never been classed or posed as an intellectual.

However I must admit I find debating with idiots extremely difficult.
I guess most posters here would have similar shortcoming.

That is why the very few posters of Mos-es calibre seem to have a free hand.

Just because one is not pro-dashnak doesn't make him an idiot. It's the person who thinks all real Armenians are dashnaks who's the real moron. All the points I've made are reasonable, either attempt to refute them or stop with the personal insults, and it just shows you have no argument left and thus have resorted to more immature means.

[londontsi]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

Just because one is not pro-dashnak doesn't make him an idiot. It's the person who thinks all real Armenians are dashnaks who's the real moron. All the points I've made are reasonable, either attempt to refute them or stop with the personal insults, and it just shows you have no argument left and thus have resorted to more immature means.

I am not pro dashnag at all.

The reason you qualify for the adjective used is the incoherent views you express when one day you are “patriotic”
next you are anti-Armenian or part Anti-Armenian, anti-Russian, Anti-Iranian, next you want to marry an Iranian,
you have relations with the President and his clique and it goes on and on.

Ok If you prefer I will call you a “barab dagar”

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

My uncle is not talking out of his ass, he knows the property laws very well, better than anybody on this forum.




And tell me how migration laws are retarded? Every country has them. Either say something substantial or stop with the personal attacks, it's really immature.

Apparently in this forum, if you aren't an axpar dashnak, you are the enemy of the armenian people. If you disagree with dashnak politics all of a sudden you're equivalent to a Turk. It's really getting ridiculous.

Foreign investors are free to purchase Armenian properties in their own names however the land that the property sits on will not be included in the sae. However, the land can be leased, and this is normally set at 99 years. Alternatively, foreign investors can setup an Armenian company. The company is then free to purchase the land that the property sits on. Many real estate agents in the country are happy to advise and help prospective property purchasers with the setting up of companies for a small fee.

http://www.hodakrealestate.nl/articles/Armenia/info/1225536387

Look I've got a real source unlike you lol

[Mos]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

however the land that the property sits on will not be included in the sae. However, the land can be leased,

But there's an important subtlety. The land upon which the property sits is not included in the purchase (in their name) rather it has to be leased, which is much different from owning it. An Armenian citizen can own that land, and doesn't have to "lease" it. By leasing it, you can have it taken away from you if there are substantial reasons.

[Mos]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

I am not pro dashnag at all.

The reason you qualify for the adjective used is the incoherent views you express when one day you are “patriotic”
next you are anti-Armenian or part Anti-Armenian, anti-Russian, Anti-Iranian, next you want to marry an Iranian,
you have relations with the President and his clique and it goes on and on.

Ok If you prefer I will call you a “barab dagar”

First of all when have I been anti-Armenian? I've always been skeptical of Russia, but still supported having good relations with them. And lastly, no I've never been anti-Iranian, some people just take my word way out of context. I've just rejected the false claim that Iranians are the brothers of Armenians, second I've rejected that fact that Armenians and Iranians have the closest bond out of all the other ethnic groups, and have criticized the oppressive and theocratic Iranian government, and lastly criticized some of the Iranian hooligans that do bad things in Armenia. I never said Iranians are bad people, and in fact many of my friends are Iranian.

Ironically, I'm often confused for a Persian by non-Armenians. And yes they have great women, but that's for a different conversation.

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

But there's an important subtlety. The land upon which the property sits is not included in the purchase (in their name) rather it has to be leased, which is much different from owning it. An Armenian citizen can own that land, and doesn't have to "lease" it. By leasing it, you can have it taken away from you if there are substantial reasons.

do you know what a lease for 99 years is, that they can stay there for the next century so the government can not do anything about it without everyone leaving it. The only thing it's not on their name the ground the rest is on their name and that will change soon too. It seems a law that doesn't make sense in this era and age.

[Mos]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

do you know what a lease for 99 years is, that they can stay there for the next century so the government can not do anything about it without everyone leaving it. The only thing it's not on their name the ground the rest is on their name and that will change soon too. It seems a law that doesn't make sense in this era and age.

Well who is leasing it to them? The government. The government has the right to take away that lease if there's suitable reason. The length of the lease doesn't matter either as it still stays a lease. If the land is under the person's name however it's their private property and government has no right to intervene.

[KarotheGreat]

Re: Armenia for Armenians

Well who is leasing it to them? The government. The government has the right to take away that lease if there's suitable reason. The length of the lease doesn't matter either as it still stays a lease. If the land is under the person's name however it's their private property and government has no right to intervene.

Actually it means that ones it is leased non of them both can break the legal contract, even it's the government. If you start breaking legal contracts the other companies that lease will just leave, so the only thing is that the ground is not their name everything else like the building and such is on their name.