Originally posted by Artsakh
View Post
To tell you honestly, I like Bell's ideas about Armenia's possible strategic plans at time of war with baboonistan. About concentrated damage and breaking of the enemy's will in war continuation. About unproductive and unnessesary thoughts of capturing baku. He has some good ideas and knowledge about lots of other things too. But what bothers me is his cinicism towards the subject he is supposedly expressing himself about. If you are so cynical about something then why are you interested in it? His satirical expressions about "our 3000 yr hystory" leaves me in doubt as to what is his intention? What, we should not be proud of our history? No matter what is happening now, the history is there and need be taken into account for future.
He knows a lot, that is abvious, he is very intelligent also. But expressing ideas is not just enough. Need a little more compassion about subject. Just flat thruths or calculations cannot get to their point without a little bit honey in them.
Sometimes I wonder if he comes here just to destroy a subject. Like human rights or freedoms. Taking a problem in the face and slapping it around is not the way.
Leave a comment: