Re: Do you think Turkey has become a regional Leader?
Call it whatever you want.
I never said large, I said majority. Besides, first republic was in the early days when Armenians and Muslims had less problems. I don't know about you, but I would not be OK with the idea that my Homeland is Muslim-majority.
I explained this earlier, but trade is by definition mutually beneficial. If it wasn't, then why would their be trade at all? India's relationship with China was different, because India was a colony (a continuation of the empire). As such, you don't trade with your own country, you take the things that you need.
I acknowledge everyone's rights. But realistically speaking, what are you going to do? Tell all the Turks to leave? In your head, can you even picture how this whole process would unfold?
You clearly know nothing about Armenia whatsoever if you refer to Ararat and Ani as tourist hotspots. I'll take it as poor word choice, but if it's not then I won't bother explaining anyway. Regardless, my rationale is that we would not be dealing with the problem of self-determination (as those areas are sparsely if at all populated).
Originally posted by hrai
View Post
I never said large, I said majority. Besides, first republic was in the early days when Armenians and Muslims had less problems. I don't know about you, but I would not be OK with the idea that my Homeland is Muslim-majority.
I explained this earlier, but trade is by definition mutually beneficial. If it wasn't, then why would their be trade at all? India's relationship with China was different, because India was a colony (a continuation of the empire). As such, you don't trade with your own country, you take the things that you need.
I acknowledge everyone's rights. But realistically speaking, what are you going to do? Tell all the Turks to leave? In your head, can you even picture how this whole process would unfold?
You clearly know nothing about Armenia whatsoever if you refer to Ararat and Ani as tourist hotspots. I'll take it as poor word choice, but if it's not then I won't bother explaining anyway. Regardless, my rationale is that we would not be dealing with the problem of self-determination (as those areas are sparsely if at all populated).
Comment